Overview
Release Date:
24 April 1930 (Japan)
more
Plot:
Thymiane is a beautiful young girl who is not having a storybook life. Her governess, Elizabeth, is thrown out of her home when she is pregnant...
more
|
add synopsis
User Comments:
heavyhanded
more
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Diary of a Lost Girl (USA)
Diário de Uma Perdida (Brazil) [pt]Diario di una donna perduta (Italy) [it]Dusze bez steru (Poland) [pl]Dziennik upadlej dziewczyny (Poland) (informal literal title) [pl]El diario de una joven perdida (Venezuela) [es]Il diario di una ragazza perduta (Italy) [it]Kadotetun päiväkirja (Finland) [fi]Le journal d'une fille perdue (France) [fr]Le journal d'une jeune fille perdue (Canada: French title) [fr]
more
Runtime:
104 min | Germany:100 min (restored version) (24 fps) | USA:79 min | 115 min (Kino Print)
Aspect Ratio:
1.33 : 1
more
Fun Stuff
Goofs:
Revealing mistakes: When the sheet is removed from the face of the "corpse", she reacts slightly.
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on
IMDb message board for Tagebuch einer Verlorenen (1929)
more
Recommendations
Related Links
This slow-paced film is beautifully shot, and enhanced by the luminous presence of Louise Brooks (as Thymian), who makes a perfect cinematic illustration of innocence under attack. But the direction is so heavyhanded that much of the message is dulled.
The chemist who preys upon Thymian is shown to be an evil lout from his first closeup, so it's hard to understand why she would ever talk to him. The reformatory directors are sadistic caricatures, and Thymian's father and stepmother are exaggerated hypocrites.
The father's acting doesn't help, as it consists mainly of standing in symbolic poses. (Irritatingly, Thymian never blames her father for his awful actions, only her stepmother.) These choices make it hard to take much of the story seriously, although probably many of the events related are based on truth.
Thymian herself can be frustrating to watch. Unluckily, and a bit absurdly, she tends to faint whenever she's confronted with a sexual situation. I assume this was the director's way of making sure viewers didn't blame her for her "fall," but perhaps there's a more interesting Freudian explanation. Twenties-fashion fans will enjoy the scenes in the surprisingly benign whorehouse. But unless you're a Louise Brooks fan or a cinematography student, I can't recommend this melodramatic film.