Overview
Release Date:
20 February 1932 (USA)
more
Tagline:
Can a full grown woman truly love a MIDGET ?
more
Plot:
A circus' beautiful trapeze artist agrees to marry the leader of side-show performers, but his deformed friends discover she is only marrying him for his inheritance.
full summary |
add synopsis
Awards:
1 win
&
1 nomination
more
User Comments:
Disturbing & Thought Provoking
more
Crew verified as complete
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Forbidden Love (USA) (informal title)
Nature's Mistakes (USA) (informal title)
The Monster Show
Fenómenos (Uruguay) (Venezuela) [es]Freaks (Austria) (West Germany) (TV title) [de]A Parada dos Monstros (Portugal) [pt]Barnum (France) [fr]Dziwolagi (Poland) [pl]Freaks - La monstrueuse parade (France) [fr]Freaks - Missgestaltete (Germany) (DVD box title) [de]Freaks - kummajaiset (Finland) (TV title) [fi]La Parade des monstres (France) [fr]La monstrueuse parade (France) [fr]La parada de los monstruos (Spain) [es]Monstres (France) [fr]Monstros (Brazil) [pt]Sirkussällskapet (Finland: Swedish title) [sv]Sirkusseurue (Finland) (informal title) [fi]
more
Runtime:
64 min
Aspect Ratio:
1.37 : 1
more
Sound Mix:
Mono (Western Electric Sound System)
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Dwarf
John George -- for reasons unknown -- does not appear in "Freaks", even though a role was specifically written for him in the screenplay.
more
Goofs:
Audio/visual unsynchronized: During the scene in which Hans' friends menace Cleopatra in the wagon, the flute soundtrack doesn't match the finger movements of the dwarf playing the flute.
more
Quotes:
Roscoe:
[
whenever he asks only one of the two Siamese twins to stay, and the twins have to leave together] You always use that as a excu-excuse, an alib-b-b-bi.
more
FAQ
How does the movie end?
What is a pinhead?
Are the freaks real or just actors in costumes?
more
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on
IMDb message board for Freaks (1932)
more
Recommendations
Related Links
The subject of human disability is still a taboo subject in Cinema, even over 70 years since this film's release.
It's difficult to imagine what impact this film would have had in the 1930's, but as it still has the ability to shock ( through the images of bodily deformity ) I can understand why many shunned and disowned this work, and why it totally ruined Todd Browning's film career.
The basic premise - that beauty is more than skin deep - can appear to be wielded with a sledgehammer, but perhaps the contemporary audience needed to be hit harder in order to make them understand the point.
The film is short ( due to enforced cuts ), and at times can move rather slowly and can appear rather 'stagey' which is a trait of many films from the 20's / 30's.
But don't let that put you off. The plot is simple, but it's the telling of the story rather than the story itself that is important. And you really do need to remind yourself that these are real people - not actors - and this was the live they led.
I rate it 9 outa 10 because they really don't make them like this any more.