32 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- Best political film ever made, 24 October 2004
Author:
William J. Fickling (wjfickling@earthlink.net) from Columbia, South Carolina, USA
I saw this film in 1972 when it came out, and I just saw it again on
cable. I am amazed at how prescient this film was. Remember, this was
before Jerry Brown, the real life politician most people will think of
as a counterpart to Redford's character, had not yet run for governor
and was still unknown outside of California. Nixon was still in office
and was about to be re-elected by a landslide. Abortion was still
illegal in all 50 states, and Roe v. Wade had not yet been decided. The
term "sound bite" had not yet been coined. "Spin" was something a
washing machine did.
Redford plays an idealistic young storefront lawyer who is persuaded to
run for the Senate as a Democrat against a Republican incumbent running
for his fourth term. He feels free to speak his mind because he knows
he hasn't a chance of winning. His freshness and honesty win over a lot
of people favorable to his politics, and suddenly the gap closes. Now
he has a chance of winning, but to do so he has to win over the
"undecided voters" in the middle of the political spectrum. (Sound
familiar? I'm writing this nine days before the Bush-Kerry election,
and no one knows who will win.) Guess what happens? Suddenly he's not
so fresh and honest anymore. And by the time he finally has a televised
debate with the incumbent, he has mastered the art of the non-answer
answer, that is, responding to a reporter's question by making a vague
statement of his own without ever answering the question.
Fast forward to 2004. The spin doctors now run the show. This film was
intended as satire and as a warning. Regrettably, it has become a
prediction. 10/10
11 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :- The Candidate, 22 March 2000
Author:
Malcolm Lawrence (Malcs) from Seattle
Robert Redford, in one of his unjustly overlooked films from 1972, stars
as
a lawyer and the son of the former governor of the state of California in
an
election year where the senatorial incumbent has no competition. Peter
Boyle
convinces Redford to run, fully expecting and anticipating to lose,
therefore being able to run on a platform of pure integrity to show how
out
of touch the current senator has become. But suddenly the public realizes
that some fresh, younger blood with an idealistic eye might be what they
truly want rather than another in a long succession of terms by the same
old
huckster.
Melvyn Douglas also stars as Redford's father. Even though this film is
almost 30 years old, the Oscar-winning screenplay by Jeremy Larner shows
just how timeless the same old issues the candidate has to decide where he
stands upon (abortion, the environment, health care) actually are. The
script really is eye-opening, because it underlines very well the point
that
even if, say, Jesus Christ were to run for office today, what He would say
is not as important as how and when He'd say it. Directed by Michael
Ritchie
(Smile, The Bad News Bears, Semi-Tough), one of the few American directors
who has been able to successfully show the black humor of the strange,
fetid
underbelly of competition in this society. Blink and you'll miss Natalie
Wood at a fund-raiser. Completely climatized to the Seventies, she looks
like Donovan's aide-de-camp.
Michael Ritchie seems to have this thing for competition -- whether downhill
racing, body building, water skiing, or, as here, politics. This isn't my
favorite human motive, besting other people, so this one comes as a rather
pleasant surprise, laden as it is with more social and political content
than the with the details of the quest. I mean -- Redford doesn't even want
the office!
"The Candidate" has the appearance of a made-for-TV movie. The credits are
presented simply, as in a TV movies. There is no underscore but the music
that we hear consists of marches with lots of drums and sometimes one or two
instruments hitting clinkers, as they would on a bandstand behind a speaker.
The photography is highly colored and flat, as in a TV movie. Everybody
seems to be dressed in suits or riding costumes. They look overly made up,
freshly preened and pruned. They drive big new American cars and live in
splendidly arid modern homes. In short they appear to lead the kind of
lives to which naive screenwriters aspire.
That out of the way, this is a pretty brave movie. It's a story of an
innocent and blunt lawyer who become progressively corrupted during the
campaign as victory seems more nearly in his grasp and the grasp of his
managers. They 86 his sideburns and give him a haircut and put him in
expensive suits. Girls love him because he displays such, well, such Robert
Redforness. One guy belts him in the mouth at a rally and I can understand
why. All men as handsome as Robert Redford should be illegal.
But he does a decent job in his minimal way. His forte lies in little
moves, as when he cocks his head and says quizzically, "Eh"? Everybody else
is quite good too, though his wife is mostly decorative. Peter Boyle is
fine, and Allan Garfinkle is always believable as a cynical scuzz.
You have to admire the way the script does not spare Redford's character.
He may be an idealist at first. What does he think of abortion? "I'm for
it." How about property taxes. "I don't know." By the end of the movie
he's learned fluent politicospeak. How's he feel about busing? "You can't
solve the problems of this country with a bus." (Right.) He knows that
he's selling himself out but he wants to WIN. As the campaign gets into
high gear he's late for a meeting with a labor leader, a grizzled Kenneth
Toby given to smoking pinched little cigarettes. Everybody in the room is
wondering where Redford is, and how he can treat an important man like Toby
with such disrespect. And where is he? We see the door to a hotel room
open and a gorgeous groupie emerge. A few seconds later Redford comes out
buttoning his jacket.
Nothing much is made of this incident. Boyle watches this parade in the
hallway, staring after the girl, but nobody says anything and the scene
lasts for only a few seconds. And here is where Ritchie and the writers
earn my respect. Think of how easily this very effective scene could have
been demolished. Boyle stopping the groupie and demanding to know what's
been going on. Boyle admonishing Redford for cheating on his wife -- "If
this ever gets out our goose is cooked!" Redford protesting that his
private life is his own business.
But none of this happens. Not in this scene or in any of the others in
which a piece of character is revealed. Ritchie trusts in the perspicacity
of the viewer. He shows us, because he doesn't have to tell us. He figures
we're smart enough to pick up this clues by ourselves. Thank you, Mister
Ritchie.
Also admirable is that the movie deals with specific issues -- abortion,
busing, unemployment, fire hazard, health concerns -- and Redford is the
Democratic candidate while Don Porter is the Republican candidate (imagine
actually NAMING the political parties and risking losing half the audience).
Porter comes across like an actor, an old ham of an actor, which suits the
part. He's smooth and wily at seducing the public, a kind of Don Juan of
the political arena. Ritchie has taken some real chances here. Porter
comes up with something like, "Oh, sure, when I was a kid we were all poor
too. Why some of us didn't even have our own SOCIAL WORKER."
It took guts to make this movie. And talent to make it so
well.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Thought-provoking look at politics and media., 6 September 2000
Author:
MiriamEB (miriam007eb@angelfire.com) from NH, USA
The Candidate, 1972, was a film that really made me think. It takes you
through Bill McKay's campaign for California senator - and shows how an
idealistic and inexperienced young man gets trapped by the media system.
Most plot summaries will tell you that it is about how he gives the
political system a kick - but I found that it was really more about how he
became lost in it. It seemed that it was more of an 'outside' movie than an
'inside' one - there is always some mystery about what is going on inside
everyone's heads. Robert Redford is really very good here as McKay - watch
for a speech he makes to himself in the car. Peter Boyle also gave a
thought-provoking performance, as Bill McKay's smooth-talking campaign
manager. A sad commentary on the way things work. Very relevant. I recommend
it for fans of Robert Redford or anybody interested in politics or media. 7
out of 10.
9 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- Like they say, it's all about politics., 5 December 2005
Author:
Lee Eisenberg (eisenberg.lee@gmail.com) from Portland, Oregon, USA
Robert Redford plays idealistic senate candidate Bill McKay. He's
mainly running to bring certain political issues into the open,
although he never actually plans to win. But as time goes by, he
realizes that whether or not he wins, he might not be able to hold on
to his values.
"The Candidate" is one of the many great movies about the world of
politics. It holds up as well today as it did in 1972 (maybe even
better). Redford gives a solid performance, as does Peter Boyle as
campaign manager Marvin Lucas. One of the most insightful scenes is the
debate between McKay and his opponent about the issues. A great movie
in every way. Look for appearances by Natalie Wood, Groucho Marx, and
Howard K. Smith.
7 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- Well done, still resonates today, 8 April 2005
Author:
(oshram@aol.com) from Cleveland
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Redford plays Bill McKay, a crusading lawyer who happens to be the son
of a former governor of California, a fact he plays down. When
incumbent Republican Crocker Jarmon (Don Porter) is running for his
umpteenth term in the senate, kingmaker Marvin Lucas (Peter Boyle)
decides to tap Bill as a wild, dark horse candidate. While young McKay
is initially suspicious and unwilling, Lucas tells him he can do
whatever he likes and say whatever he likes on the campaign trail
because no one expects him to win. With that freedom in mind, McKay
sets off to run a very different style of campaign.
The acting here is all top notch. Redford, a natural for the cameras,
manages to make McKay fairly awkward and uncomfortable in the early
going, but as he warms to being what a candidate is all about, he takes
to the campaign trail amazingly well. Boyle is also excellent as the
kind of old bastard it always takes to win one of these races, the
political insider every race needs to smooth over the opposition within
the party and crucify those without. Porter is also good as Jarmon,
showing a stiff, wooden, conservative incumbent who must have seemed
hopelessly out of date in 1972 -- especially considering his dashing,
youthful opposition -- but who also sounds oddly like any politician in
office today, with his talk of loving America and supporting business.
The movie makes a very keen point about what people have to do to get
elected, and we see a slow whittling of McKay's priorities as he must
sacrifice his principles one by one in order to get elected. By the end
of the campaign, the fresh-faced, honest young man we were introduced
to at the start is gone, replaced by a slick image who is all things to
all people. To be fair McKay fights this process, but the movie makes a
strong point that, simply, this is what is required in order to win.
The end note -- McKay asking Lucas "What do we do now?" is both telling
and chilling, that even thirty years ago, there was such distrust and
distaste for politics and what it did to people (and this was a year
*before* Watergate). The Candidate still plays well despite some dated
material, and the lessons it offers about politics and what it does to
people still apply today. This is a film well worth your time
investigating.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- A must for cynics, 1 November 1999
Author:
saccenti from Laurel, MD
Robert Redford, the idealistic son of a former party machine governor, gets
encouraged into running for the U.S. Senate by a coterie of professional
handlers. Fascinating film, alternately satiric, cynical, subtle, and
ironic. Shot mostly in a documentary style. A must for cynics and/or
political junkies; others won't care. A good performance by Redford is
complimented by fine work by Boyle and Garfield. Douglas is also great as
the candidate's father. One of filmdom's classic closing lines. 2 stars
of
4 on a tough scale.
4 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- Great movie, hope they make a sequel some day!, 5 January 2006
Author:
Streetwolf
I finally got to see this movie and I found it very charming.
Quick summary:
Redford plays a semi-serious lawyer Bill McKay whose father was once a
governor for California. Now some want him to follow his father's
footsteps and become a candidate for senator, but he has a tough rival
and his attitude towards it all seems as if he doesn't want to do it,
but does it anyway.
Redford is just great in this movie... and very cute! The ending is
left just right fora sequel, which I wonder why they haven't made yet.
8/10.
thoughtful political study, 9 February 2008
Author:
HelloTexas11 from United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
'The Candidate' isn't a great film but it does have its perceptive
moments and a certain sly, knowing quality about the subject it deals
with, big-time politics. This shouldn't be too surprising, as its
screenwriter, Jeremy Larner, was a former speech writer for Eugene
McCarthy during his presidential bid. Perhaps it's the passage of time
and the advent of 24-hour cable news networks, but much of the film
seems obvious now, almost quaint. Robert Redford plays Bill McKay, son
of a famous California governor, who has no interest in running for
office at the start; he's a liberal activist lawyer helping Indians,
hippies, and the downtrodden in general. A political consultant, Marvin
Lucas (Peter Boyle), seeks him out to become the Democratic candidate
for the U.S. Senate, mainly because no one else wants to take on the
popular Republican incumbent. Lucas presents the idea to McKay like
this: you don't have a chance of winning, so you can say whatever you
want. McKay brushes aside his initial misgivings, finding that the idea
appeals to him. After the campaign has been underway a while and McKay
has secured his party's nomination, Lucas tells McKay the polls show
that not only will he lose, he'll be "humiliated." Now why he would be
humiliated, much less why it should matter to him, is never made clear
and is a weakness in the script. Wasn't he supposed to lose? In any
event, it does change McKay's thinking and so an effort is made to
'broaden' his appeal. He begins watering down his speeches and his
campaign takes on a more generic tone, with upbeat TV commercials and a
cheerful slogan, "For a better way: Bill McKay!" The candidate and some
of his supporters become increasingly disillusioned even while his
standings in the polls rises. Finally, there is a televised debate
between McKay and his opponent, where at the end, a frustrated McKay
lets loose and ticks off a litany of social problems that he says
haven't been addressed in the debate. This return to his liberal roots
has a mixed reception; Lucas thinks he's ruined everything but some of
McKay's disheartened followers are buoyed. McKay follows this approach
through to the election in which to everyone's surprise, not least him
and Lucas, he defeats the incumbent to become senator. The famous last
shot is of McKay sitting in a hotel room during the election
celebration, asking Lucas, "Marvin, what do we do now?", which never
receives an answer as a crowd of media and campaign volunteers swarm
into the room to congratulate him. There's a lot of truth in 'The
Candidate,' and though it is written from a liberal perspective, it
doesn't spare that side of the political equation from some hard
questions, especially that very last one.
A who's who of 1970s politics, 18 November 2007
Author:
Sky Beaver from Canada
One of the best movies about politics EVER.
One of the really cool things about this movie is the list of cameo
appearances. Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, John Tunney, Gene
Washington, Cedric Hardman, Van Amburg, and other notables from
California Democratic politics circa 1972 are all in here.
George McGovern reputedly hated this movie. Remember that he was the
Democratic nominee for president in 1972. When asked about "The
Candidate", he said "I didn't like it, I thought it reflects the
darkest side of American politics".
Redford is amazing in this film, as an idealistic young lawyer torn
between principle and ambition. Definitely one of the greatest actors
of our time.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Candidate (1972)
32 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

Best political film ever made, 24 October 2004
Author: William J. Fickling (wjfickling@earthlink.net) from Columbia, South Carolina, USA
I saw this film in 1972 when it came out, and I just saw it again on cable. I am amazed at how prescient this film was. Remember, this was before Jerry Brown, the real life politician most people will think of as a counterpart to Redford's character, had not yet run for governor and was still unknown outside of California. Nixon was still in office and was about to be re-elected by a landslide. Abortion was still illegal in all 50 states, and Roe v. Wade had not yet been decided. The term "sound bite" had not yet been coined. "Spin" was something a washing machine did.
Redford plays an idealistic young storefront lawyer who is persuaded to run for the Senate as a Democrat against a Republican incumbent running for his fourth term. He feels free to speak his mind because he knows he hasn't a chance of winning. His freshness and honesty win over a lot of people favorable to his politics, and suddenly the gap closes. Now he has a chance of winning, but to do so he has to win over the "undecided voters" in the middle of the political spectrum. (Sound familiar? I'm writing this nine days before the Bush-Kerry election, and no one knows who will win.) Guess what happens? Suddenly he's not so fresh and honest anymore. And by the time he finally has a televised debate with the incumbent, he has mastered the art of the non-answer answer, that is, responding to a reporter's question by making a vague statement of his own without ever answering the question.
Fast forward to 2004. The spin doctors now run the show. This film was intended as satire and as a warning. Regrettably, it has become a prediction. 10/10
11 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :-

The Candidate, 22 March 2000
Author: Malcolm Lawrence (Malcs) from Seattle
Robert Redford, in one of his unjustly overlooked films from 1972, stars as a lawyer and the son of the former governor of the state of California in an election year where the senatorial incumbent has no competition. Peter Boyle convinces Redford to run, fully expecting and anticipating to lose, therefore being able to run on a platform of pure integrity to show how out of touch the current senator has become. But suddenly the public realizes that some fresh, younger blood with an idealistic eye might be what they truly want rather than another in a long succession of terms by the same old huckster. Melvyn Douglas also stars as Redford's father. Even though this film is almost 30 years old, the Oscar-winning screenplay by Jeremy Larner shows just how timeless the same old issues the candidate has to decide where he stands upon (abortion, the environment, health care) actually are. The script really is eye-opening, because it underlines very well the point that even if, say, Jesus Christ were to run for office today, what He would say is not as important as how and when He'd say it. Directed by Michael Ritchie (Smile, The Bad News Bears, Semi-Tough), one of the few American directors who has been able to successfully show the black humor of the strange, fetid underbelly of competition in this society. Blink and you'll miss Natalie Wood at a fund-raiser. Completely climatized to the Seventies, she looks like Donovan's aide-de-camp.
12 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-
Not bad, 15 April 2004
Author: Robert J. Maxwell (rmax304823@yahoo.com) from Deming, New Mexico
Michael Ritchie seems to have this thing for competition -- whether downhill racing, body building, water skiing, or, as here, politics. This isn't my favorite human motive, besting other people, so this one comes as a rather pleasant surprise, laden as it is with more social and political content than the with the details of the quest. I mean -- Redford doesn't even want the office!
"The Candidate" has the appearance of a made-for-TV movie. The credits are presented simply, as in a TV movies. There is no underscore but the music that we hear consists of marches with lots of drums and sometimes one or two instruments hitting clinkers, as they would on a bandstand behind a speaker. The photography is highly colored and flat, as in a TV movie. Everybody seems to be dressed in suits or riding costumes. They look overly made up, freshly preened and pruned. They drive big new American cars and live in splendidly arid modern homes. In short they appear to lead the kind of lives to which naive screenwriters aspire.
That out of the way, this is a pretty brave movie. It's a story of an innocent and blunt lawyer who become progressively corrupted during the campaign as victory seems more nearly in his grasp and the grasp of his managers. They 86 his sideburns and give him a haircut and put him in expensive suits. Girls love him because he displays such, well, such Robert Redforness. One guy belts him in the mouth at a rally and I can understand why. All men as handsome as Robert Redford should be illegal.
But he does a decent job in his minimal way. His forte lies in little moves, as when he cocks his head and says quizzically, "Eh"? Everybody else is quite good too, though his wife is mostly decorative. Peter Boyle is fine, and Allan Garfinkle is always believable as a cynical scuzz.
You have to admire the way the script does not spare Redford's character. He may be an idealist at first. What does he think of abortion? "I'm for it." How about property taxes. "I don't know." By the end of the movie he's learned fluent politicospeak. How's he feel about busing? "You can't solve the problems of this country with a bus." (Right.) He knows that he's selling himself out but he wants to WIN. As the campaign gets into high gear he's late for a meeting with a labor leader, a grizzled Kenneth Toby given to smoking pinched little cigarettes. Everybody in the room is wondering where Redford is, and how he can treat an important man like Toby with such disrespect. And where is he? We see the door to a hotel room open and a gorgeous groupie emerge. A few seconds later Redford comes out buttoning his jacket.
Nothing much is made of this incident. Boyle watches this parade in the hallway, staring after the girl, but nobody says anything and the scene lasts for only a few seconds. And here is where Ritchie and the writers earn my respect. Think of how easily this very effective scene could have been demolished. Boyle stopping the groupie and demanding to know what's been going on. Boyle admonishing Redford for cheating on his wife -- "If this ever gets out our goose is cooked!" Redford protesting that his private life is his own business.
But none of this happens. Not in this scene or in any of the others in which a piece of character is revealed. Ritchie trusts in the perspicacity of the viewer. He shows us, because he doesn't have to tell us. He figures we're smart enough to pick up this clues by ourselves. Thank you, Mister Ritchie.
Also admirable is that the movie deals with specific issues -- abortion, busing, unemployment, fire hazard, health concerns -- and Redford is the Democratic candidate while Don Porter is the Republican candidate (imagine actually NAMING the political parties and risking losing half the audience). Porter comes across like an actor, an old ham of an actor, which suits the part. He's smooth and wily at seducing the public, a kind of Don Juan of the political arena. Ritchie has taken some real chances here. Porter comes up with something like, "Oh, sure, when I was a kid we were all poor too. Why some of us didn't even have our own SOCIAL WORKER."
It took guts to make this movie. And talent to make it so well.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Thought-provoking look at politics and media., 6 September 2000
Author: MiriamEB (miriam007eb@angelfire.com) from NH, USA
The Candidate, 1972, was a film that really made me think. It takes you through Bill McKay's campaign for California senator - and shows how an idealistic and inexperienced young man gets trapped by the media system. Most plot summaries will tell you that it is about how he gives the political system a kick - but I found that it was really more about how he became lost in it. It seemed that it was more of an 'outside' movie than an 'inside' one - there is always some mystery about what is going on inside everyone's heads. Robert Redford is really very good here as McKay - watch for a speech he makes to himself in the car. Peter Boyle also gave a thought-provoking performance, as Bill McKay's smooth-talking campaign manager. A sad commentary on the way things work. Very relevant. I recommend it for fans of Robert Redford or anybody interested in politics or media. 7 out of 10.
9 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

Like they say, it's all about politics., 5 December 2005
Author: Lee Eisenberg (eisenberg.lee@gmail.com) from Portland, Oregon, USA
Robert Redford plays idealistic senate candidate Bill McKay. He's mainly running to bring certain political issues into the open, although he never actually plans to win. But as time goes by, he realizes that whether or not he wins, he might not be able to hold on to his values.
"The Candidate" is one of the many great movies about the world of politics. It holds up as well today as it did in 1972 (maybe even better). Redford gives a solid performance, as does Peter Boyle as campaign manager Marvin Lucas. One of the most insightful scenes is the debate between McKay and his opponent about the issues. A great movie in every way. Look for appearances by Natalie Wood, Groucho Marx, and Howard K. Smith.
7 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-

Well done, still resonates today, 8 April 2005
Author: (oshram@aol.com) from Cleveland
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Redford plays Bill McKay, a crusading lawyer who happens to be the son of a former governor of California, a fact he plays down. When incumbent Republican Crocker Jarmon (Don Porter) is running for his umpteenth term in the senate, kingmaker Marvin Lucas (Peter Boyle) decides to tap Bill as a wild, dark horse candidate. While young McKay is initially suspicious and unwilling, Lucas tells him he can do whatever he likes and say whatever he likes on the campaign trail because no one expects him to win. With that freedom in mind, McKay sets off to run a very different style of campaign.
The acting here is all top notch. Redford, a natural for the cameras, manages to make McKay fairly awkward and uncomfortable in the early going, but as he warms to being what a candidate is all about, he takes to the campaign trail amazingly well. Boyle is also excellent as the kind of old bastard it always takes to win one of these races, the political insider every race needs to smooth over the opposition within the party and crucify those without. Porter is also good as Jarmon, showing a stiff, wooden, conservative incumbent who must have seemed hopelessly out of date in 1972 -- especially considering his dashing, youthful opposition -- but who also sounds oddly like any politician in office today, with his talk of loving America and supporting business.
The movie makes a very keen point about what people have to do to get elected, and we see a slow whittling of McKay's priorities as he must sacrifice his principles one by one in order to get elected. By the end of the campaign, the fresh-faced, honest young man we were introduced to at the start is gone, replaced by a slick image who is all things to all people. To be fair McKay fights this process, but the movie makes a strong point that, simply, this is what is required in order to win. The end note -- McKay asking Lucas "What do we do now?" is both telling and chilling, that even thirty years ago, there was such distrust and distaste for politics and what it did to people (and this was a year *before* Watergate). The Candidate still plays well despite some dated material, and the lessons it offers about politics and what it does to people still apply today. This is a film well worth your time investigating.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

A must for cynics, 1 November 1999
Author: saccenti from Laurel, MD
Robert Redford, the idealistic son of a former party machine governor, gets encouraged into running for the U.S. Senate by a coterie of professional handlers. Fascinating film, alternately satiric, cynical, subtle, and ironic. Shot mostly in a documentary style. A must for cynics and/or political junkies; others won't care. A good performance by Redford is complimented by fine work by Boyle and Garfield. Douglas is also great as the candidate's father. One of filmdom's classic closing lines. 2 stars of 4 on a tough scale.
4 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

Great movie, hope they make a sequel some day!, 5 January 2006
Author: Streetwolf
I finally got to see this movie and I found it very charming.
Quick summary:
Redford plays a semi-serious lawyer Bill McKay whose father was once a governor for California. Now some want him to follow his father's footsteps and become a candidate for senator, but he has a tough rival and his attitude towards it all seems as if he doesn't want to do it, but does it anyway.
Redford is just great in this movie... and very cute! The ending is left just right fora sequel, which I wonder why they haven't made yet.
8/10.
thoughtful political study, 9 February 2008

Author: HelloTexas11 from United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
'The Candidate' isn't a great film but it does have its perceptive moments and a certain sly, knowing quality about the subject it deals with, big-time politics. This shouldn't be too surprising, as its screenwriter, Jeremy Larner, was a former speech writer for Eugene McCarthy during his presidential bid. Perhaps it's the passage of time and the advent of 24-hour cable news networks, but much of the film seems obvious now, almost quaint. Robert Redford plays Bill McKay, son of a famous California governor, who has no interest in running for office at the start; he's a liberal activist lawyer helping Indians, hippies, and the downtrodden in general. A political consultant, Marvin Lucas (Peter Boyle), seeks him out to become the Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate, mainly because no one else wants to take on the popular Republican incumbent. Lucas presents the idea to McKay like this: you don't have a chance of winning, so you can say whatever you want. McKay brushes aside his initial misgivings, finding that the idea appeals to him. After the campaign has been underway a while and McKay has secured his party's nomination, Lucas tells McKay the polls show that not only will he lose, he'll be "humiliated." Now why he would be humiliated, much less why it should matter to him, is never made clear and is a weakness in the script. Wasn't he supposed to lose? In any event, it does change McKay's thinking and so an effort is made to 'broaden' his appeal. He begins watering down his speeches and his campaign takes on a more generic tone, with upbeat TV commercials and a cheerful slogan, "For a better way: Bill McKay!" The candidate and some of his supporters become increasingly disillusioned even while his standings in the polls rises. Finally, there is a televised debate between McKay and his opponent, where at the end, a frustrated McKay lets loose and ticks off a litany of social problems that he says haven't been addressed in the debate. This return to his liberal roots has a mixed reception; Lucas thinks he's ruined everything but some of McKay's disheartened followers are buoyed. McKay follows this approach through to the election in which to everyone's surprise, not least him and Lucas, he defeats the incumbent to become senator. The famous last shot is of McKay sitting in a hotel room during the election celebration, asking Lucas, "Marvin, what do we do now?", which never receives an answer as a crowd of media and campaign volunteers swarm into the room to congratulate him. There's a lot of truth in 'The Candidate,' and though it is written from a liberal perspective, it doesn't spare that side of the political equation from some hard questions, especially that very last one.
A who's who of 1970s politics, 18 November 2007

Author: Sky Beaver from Canada
One of the best movies about politics EVER.
One of the really cool things about this movie is the list of cameo appearances. Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, John Tunney, Gene Washington, Cedric Hardman, Van Amburg, and other notables from California Democratic politics circa 1972 are all in here.
George McGovern reputedly hated this movie. Remember that he was the Democratic nominee for president in 1972. When asked about "The Candidate", he said "I didn't like it, I thought it reflects the darkest side of American politics".
Redford is amazing in this film, as an idealistic young lawyer torn between principle and ambition. Definitely one of the greatest actors of our time.
Add another comment
Related Links