Free on IMDb
16 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :- Before Luke Skywalker, there was Doug McClure..., 17 July 2007 Author: TrevorAclea from London, England
His John Dark-Kevin Connor fantasy adventures were a mainstay of Summer holiday movies in the days before Star Wars: they weren't masterpieces, they didn't boast state-of-the-art special effects, but they were exactly what an audience of kids wanted from a film back in the mid 70s.At the Earth's Core catches just the right tone for the appropriately named Burroughs' pulp adventure about Victorian inventor Peter Cushing and the inevitable Doug McClure ending up in the underground world of Pelucidar and battling its evil telepathic fighting dinosaurs. This time the puppets are gone in favour of men in monster suits, which is a lot more fun if you're willing to suspend your disbelief, and if you're not there's always Caroline Munro's cleavage to look at. Aside from what may well be Peter Cushing's worst performance, an irritating but dottier rehash of his movie Dr Who ("You can't mesmerise me, I'm British!"), it's easily the best of the John Dark-Kevin Connor-Doug McClure fantasy adventures, surprisingly well directed and boasting an atmospheric use of colour. Never especially good at exterior scenes, Alan Hume's photography gains immensely from the control a studio set gives him (the film was shot entirely on soundstages) to paint a luridly vivid world worthy of a pulp novel cover. Not high art but definitely great Saturday matinée fun.
15 out of 18 people found the following comment useful :- You cannot mesmerize me... I'm rubber, 6 January 2004 Author: w00f from The Flaming Wreckage
Make no mistake, this is a very silly movie. Peter Cushing knew it; he gives one of his most over-the-top, ham it up performances.Generally speaking, this movie has awful production values. Flying rubber pterodactyl creatures ruling the underworld. Piggish humanoid servants of said pterodactyls. A vapid, vacant-eyed Caroline Munro. An oh-so-macho leading man who, when you really look at him, doesn't look all that tough.Still, At the Earth's Core has a charming innocence about it that gives it a bit of appeal. Best viewed by 10 year old boys on rainy Saturday afternoons, it's all in good fun.
16 out of 20 people found the following comment useful :- Last and greatest of the "scientist-discovers-prehistoric-world" films, 11 July 2002 Author: bio_cloner from America
If one ignores the fake-looking giant bird creature at the very beginning, the rest of the movie is much more thoughtful and very well done. Scientists tunnel deep within the Earth and discover a whole prehistoric world. But in this movie, it seems the flying reptiles are super-intelligent and have telepathic dominion over Man, using some for servants but others for food. The original was much bloodier than the tv version. This movie was the last of it's kind, and the end of an era.
15 out of 19 people found the following comment useful :- Edgar Rice Burroughs was never like this., 13 June 1999 Author: G.Spider
This film begins with a wonderful piece of music and an excellently tense and edge-of-seat sequence in which Victorian scientists (played by Doug McClure and Peter Cushing) drill into the depths of the earth in their 'Iron Mole'. You truly believe you're going to see a great film to rival 'The Land That Time Forgot'. But then the two companions arrive in the underground world and encounter their first monster, which is quite obviously a man in an outfit which looks like a dinosaur with a parrot's face. From here it's downhill all the way as the intrepid scientists encounter ovens with tentacles on strings, fire-breathing critters with clearly visible flame-thrower nozzles and pterodactyl-people who, when they fall down, explode for no apparent reason. It's a shame the special-effects are so awful, as the storyline is quite interesting with some good situations and the music is excellently atmospheric. But what we have here is a good script let down by poor execution. All I can say in this film's favor is it's watchably bad. But I'd have been a lot happier if it was watchably good.
10 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- Sure, it's cheap but it's FUN!, 10 January 2007 Author: Bryce David
The main criticism of AT THE EARTH'S CORE is that it's cheap, the special effects are bad and so on and so forth. Yes, some of the special effects are painfully bad but what a lot of folks overlook about it is that it's actually quite fun, which is very important in my book.In comparison, just look at the latest STAR WARS films: they have the latest, greatest special effects created by the latest technological advances which are capable in creating stunning visual effects as far reaching as the human imagination can imagine and yet, with all the razzle dazzle, those films were as exciting as a funeral. As Yoda would say, Fun they're not! In other words, who cares if the FX aren't the greatest when the spirit of the film is fast-paced, humorous and clearly set on the side of action. I love everything about AT THE EARTH'S CORE: the contrast between stodgy Victorian England VS the wild other-worldly, colorful setting of Pellucidar, the cast of characters, the concept of a lost underground world, the telepathic Pterodactyls, the human slaves rebelling, Jubal the ugly one (lol!), the inspired teaming of Peter Cushing (who's great!) and Doug McClure, the excellent music (it's really good), cinematography by the amazing Alan Hume and last but not least, Caroline Munro. She's effing sexy in this movie. One of the sexiest B-movie babes ever captured on screen.Seriously, anyone who doesn't like this movie doesn't know what fun is. Gimme AT THE EARTH'S CORE over any turgid STAR WARS prequels any time! At least it has Caroline Munro, which no CGI fx can ever recreate.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- One of the BEST Old School Monster Movies, 6 February 2007 Author: kc_gttld from United States
CONTEXT is everything when one goes to rate a movie. When rating this movie one has to consider the time in which it was made. We didn't really know WHAT the inside of the EARTH was in those days so you can't rag on the movie too much for the plot (based on a much older book). For the era, this was top notch special effects and the production quality was great. I watched this movie in a masterfully restored HD master. For the time the makeup and effects almost make the guys in the rubber suits look plausible as a monster-thing. This is pure movie cheese complete with bad rubber suits, models, and creepy costumes. AWESOME. PS Doug McClure ROCKS!
8 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- Total B-Movie delight. Watch it and be amused., 24 December 2002 Author: Rob Taylor (Rob_Taylor) from London
Hi! I'm Doug McClure. You may remember me from such other cheesy adaptations of Edgar Rice Burroughs works as, The Land that Time Forgot and The People that Time Forgot.This movie is hysterical. Even allowing when it was made, the monsters are just bad, bad, bad, bad, bad! All rubber suited things with people inside. There's even a fire-breathing beastie, but don't look at it's mouth too close or you'll see the flame-thrower nozzle poking out. Couple that with Peter Cushing's wonderfully useless "old professor" routine and Doug's stoic hero performance and you'll laugh the whole way through. Carolyn Monroe plays Dougies love interest, though I did wonder where she got cosmetics from, living deep in the Earth. Perhaps the Avon lady calls there.The flying monsters at the end are particularly silly. They have all the aerodynamic properties (and believability) of a concrete block. Just a bunch of fat blokes in rubber suits. All they do is sit on a ledge and hypnotise people. It's only when that fails, or it's feeding time, that they "swoop" down to attack. And when I say swoop, I mean someone prods the rubber thingy in the back and it swings down on a cable.Total B-Movie delight. Watch it and be amused. Be very amused.
6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- Rubber-monster-tastic!!, 12 July 2008 Author: Evil Geneticist from Kingdom of Fife
Shame on you if you give this film a low rating. How can you not like a film that has Doug McClure, Peter Cushing, silly rubber monsters, fights, (and for the guys, that woman that was the baddie's henchwoman in The Spy Who Loved Me and one of the seventies Sinbad films, not wearing very much of whom my mother said "She wasn't picked for the colour of her eyes"), lava, silly wigs and a daft Victorian drilling machine very much like the one used in the old Thunderbirds series? Whoever watched this film and slagged it off was watching it for the wrong reasons. It may be crap, but is definitely good crap. They don't make 'em like they used to, sigh......
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- Silly sci-fi effort is sometimes a real hoot., 17 February 2006 Author: Scott LeBrun from Winnipeg, Canada
Edgar Rice Burroughs adaptation in which Doug McClure (who was in a couple of similar 1970's genre entries) and a hilariously daffy Peter Cushing play Victorian era scientists who burrow into the inner earth in a giant mechanical "mole" and encounter a primitive civilization that is terrorized by some ridiculous looking monsters.This kind of reminded me of some of those old 'Spider-Man' (the 1967-1970 animated series) episodes where he'd go beneath the Earth or to remote locations and encounter a non-stop variety of truly wacky creatures. The creatures in this movie are so absurd that I got a lot of laughs out of them. I'm not sure if the film-makers intended this film to be so funny, but that's the way that it ends up. Yes, an adaptation of this story probably could have been better with a bigger budget and better production values, but at least if it's good for laughs - even unintentional ones, that counts for something.McClure is merely passable, but Cushing was fun in his hammy performance, and Caroline Munro is as always an alluring bit of eye candy.The sets, special effects, and photography fare a little better than the creature work - this film was moderately interesting to look at.Overall, I kind of liked it basically because it *was* so darn silly. At least nobody in the cast seems to be taking themselves too seriously.5/10
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- *gasps* "It's Jubal the Ugly One!", 29 October 2004 Author: Angel Meiru
Man, what isn't there to like about this movie? Sure the SFX are kinda low-budget and some of the actors sort of ham it up, but imagine if this film was made today with CG and bland actors whom take everything seriously, it just would not be the same movie.The movie follows, well, two scientists whom drill beneath the Earth's core, run into bizarre monsters (whom looked like they were kicked out of Daiei's Gamera films BTW), become slaves, and explore the strange world and so on. I don't remember the novel very well, but I sure know that this movie is one of those "so cheesy and wild, it's hard to forget" type of movies.BTW, check out the part with Jubal the Ugly one! PRICELESS!
Add another comment
