Der Name der Rose (1986)

Director:

Jean-Jacques Annaud

Writers:

Umberto Eco (novel)
Andrew Birkin (screenplay) ...

Release Date:

24 September 1986 (USA)

Genre:

Drama | Mystery | Thriller | Crime

Tagline:

Who, in the name of God, is getting away with murder?

Plot:

An intellectually nonconformist monk investigates a series of mysterious deaths in an isolated abbey.

Plot Keywords:

Death | Abbey | Monk | Franciscan | Apocalypse

Awards:

Won 2 BAFTA Film Awards. Another 14 wins & 2 nominations

Cast

Sean Connery	...	William of Baskerville
Christian Slater	...	Adso of Melk
Helmut Qualtinger	...	Remigio da Varagine
Elya Baskin	...	Severinus
Michael Lonsdale	...	The Abbot
Volker Prechtel	...	Malachia
Feodor Chaliapin Jr.	...	Jorge de Burgos
William Hickey	...	Ubertino da Casale
Michael Habeck	...	Berengar
Urs Althaus	...	Venantius
Valentina Vargas	...	The Girl
Ron Perlman	...	Salvatore
Leopoldo Trieste	...	Michele da Cesena
Franco Valobra	...	Jerome of Kaffa
Vernon Dobtcheff	...	Hugh of Newcastle

Also Known As:

The Name of the Rose (UK) (USA)
Il nome della rosa (Italy)
Le nom de la rose (France)
El nombre de la rosa (Argentina) (Spain) [es]
Rosens namn (Finland: Swedish title) (Sweden) [sv]
A rózsa neve (Hungary) [hu]
El nom de la rosa (Spain: Catalan title) [ca]
Gülün adi (Turkey: Turkish title) [tr]
Ime ruze (Croatia) [hr]
Imie rózy (Poland) [pl]
Le nom de la rose (Canada: French title) [fr]
O Nome da Rosa (Portugal) [pt]
Rosens navn (Denmark) [da]
Ruusun nimi (Finland) [fi]
To onoma tou rodou (Greece) [el]

Runtime:

130 min

Country:

France | Italy | West Germany

Language:

English | Latin

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Sound Mix:

70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints) | Dolby (35 mm prints)

Certification:

Portugal:M/12 | Iceland:14 | Canada:R (Nova Scotia/Ontario) | Spain:13 | UK:15 (re-rating) | Argentina:16 | Canada:13+ (Quebec) | Finland:K-16 | France:U | Netherlands:16 | Norway:15 | Singapore:M18 | Sweden:15 | UK:18 | USA:R | West Germany:16 | Canada:PA (Manitoba) | Australia:M

Filming Locations:

Abruzzo, Italy

Company:

Neue Constantin Film

Trivia:

Sean Connery's career was at such a low point when he read for the role that Columbia pictures refused to finance the film when director Jean-Jacques Annaud cast him as William of Baskerville.

Goofs:

Revealing mistakes: (At 60:52) When the body of brother Berengar (who was found drowned in the bath) is lying on a table for examination, a shaft of light creeps over the actor's eye, causing him to blink.

Quotes:

[first lines]
Voice of Adso as an Old Man: Having reached the end of my poor sinner's life, my hair now white, I prepare to leave on this parchment my testimony as to the wondrous and terrible events that I witnessed in my youth, towards the end of the year of our Lord 1327. May God grant me the wisdom and grace to be the faithful chronicler of the happenings that took place in a remote abbey in the dark north of Italy. An abbey whose name it seems, even now, pious and prudent to omit.

Movie Connections:

Referenced in 33 (2008)

The Novel Predates the Davinci Code by 20 years

A number of people have commented on the similarity of this film, and the Novel by Umberto Eco, to the DaVinci Code. For those who were not born then, The Name of the Rose was published in 1980, thus predating DaVinci by about 20 or more years. I must admit that I found DaVinci to be a mass market popularization of Eco's theme, in short a "rip off". Still, it may be the popularity of Brown's novel which has resulted in Name of the Rose being brought back in a DVD version, and for that I am truly thankful.

For a film which was not favorably reviewed by the critics, it is surprising how many reviewers 20 years later are giving it a 10. Either the film wore well or tastes have changed. I loved the film first time around and was delighted to find it on DVD. Certainly the screenplay had to deviate from the philosophizing of the book. It would have been almost unwatchably "talkie" had it not, and those of us who want to read the sermons/discussions can read the book. The film stands on it's own.

The most ominous feeling for me, living in the religious and politically free thinking 21st century, was the realization that the church had such a grip on every aspect of life and thinking in the middle ages, and that any perceived repudiation of accepted Church dogma was deemed heresy and punishable by torture and a horrible death. That one group of people should wield such power, and the length they would go to to hold on to that power is truly frightening. The rigid class structure where the nobility and church owned the land which the peasants worked, and supported those above them while being kept down by those above, was very well conveyed in the film. Life was short and hard, health was poor and the plague could return at any time, carrying off those who had not been carried off by the incessant wars. Not a pleasant age to live. The period of the film is set just prior to the reformation. It is hardly surprising that the teachings of the various religious orders began to be questioned.