Safe (1995)

Director:

Todd Haynes

Writer:

Todd Haynes (written by)

Release Date:

30 June 1995 (USA)

Genre:

Thriller | Drama

Tagline:

In the 21st century nobody will be...Safe.

Plot:

"Safe" has been described as a horror movie of the soul, a description that director Todd Haynes relishes...

Plot Keywords:

Group Therapy | Doctor | Couch | Desert | Allegory

Awards:

3 wins & 6 nominations

Cast

Julianne Moore	...	Carol White
Peter Friedman	...	Peter Dunning
Xander Berkeley	...	Greg White
Susan Norman	...	Linda
Kate McGregor-Stewart	...	Claire (as Kate McGregor Stewart)
Mary Carver	...	Nell
Steven Gilborn	...	Dr. Hubbard
April Grace	...	Susan
Peter Crombie	...	Dr. Reynolds
Ronnie Farer	...	Barbara
Jodie Markell	...	Anita
Lorna Scott	...	Marilyn
James LeGros	...	Chris
Dean Norris	...	Mover
Julie Burgess	...	Aerobics instructor

Also Known As:

Chemical Syndrome (Japan: English title) (video title) [en]
Safe (France) [fr]
Seguro (Portugal) [pt]

MPAA:

Rated R for a sex scene and brief language.

Runtime:

119 min

Country:

USA | UK

Language:

English

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Sound Mix:

Stereo

Certification:

Australia:M | Finland:K-11 | France:U | Portugal:M/12 | UK:15 | USA:R | Netherlands:12

Filming Locations:

Brandeis-Bardin Institute - 1101 Pepper Tree Lane, Simi Valley, California, USA

Company:

American Playhouse Theatrical Films

Trivia:

In an outdoor restaurant scene, one of the people sitting in the background is the father of the director Todd Haynes. His sister Wendy is also in that scene.

Movie Connections:

Referenced in "Game-On: (#3.2)" (1998)

Soundtrack:

Slow Water

Difficult to pigeonhole but engaging & interesting with a great lead performance despite the problems inherent in Haynes' otherwise engaging delivery

Carol White is quite a quiet woman, living in comfort in a lovely house in a quiet corner of California. This quietness starts to take a turn for the worse when a coughing fit starts from being stuck behind a lorry in traffic. This is the first of a series of apparently allergic reactions to something, although the doctors can find nothing wrong with her – with the psychiatrists unable to pinpoint anything either. As the reactions get worse, Carol starts to feel trapped by her own surroundings and begins to believe that her illnesses are being caused by pollutions and chemicals around her in the world.

As Theo has already stated in his review, this is a film that is hard to put in a box but, hoping that it will become a thriller or a "normal" drama will certainly not help you get into it because this is a film that, with the best will in the world, is a strange affair that is deliberately hard to put a finger on. The film opens with a great feel of emptiness and isolation that Haynes creates with clever framing of his shots; this makes the film feel like it is going to be a slowburn horror, but it works better than this because the "horror" is actually just the blandness of Carol's upper-middle-class life. As it develops the film keeps this tone while being deliberately ambiguous about what we are meant to think – is Carol sick in her mind or really as a result of chemicals? Is her retreat really a clean place of healing or is it all expensive new-age mumbo jumbo. The film never really answers these questions and it thus produces a film that engaged me by freeing me up to think for myself and question what I was watching. At times it appeared to be savaging the new-age illnesses of the Californian bored, at others it seemed to be very clear that Carol was sick.

Sadly the downside of this mood of ambiguity and isolation is that the film moves very slowly and doesn't actually deliver any satisfying conclusions. As much as I wanted not to see this as a problem (because I liked the aspects of the film that produced this as a bi-product) it is hard to ignore it although I personally felt there was enough going on from writer and director Haynes to make up for the inherent weakness it caused. It also helps that the wonderful Moore so totally "gets" her character and gives a convincing and engaging performance. She rarely hit a bum note and her performance is another reason that the lack of dramatic direction or action was not a killer problem for me. She easily dominates the film but support is quite good from Berkeley, LeGros, Gilborn and others, although the film was never not Moore's.

Overall this is a film that is very hard to describe because its very aim is to confound the expectations and opinions of the audience, and even then not in a consistent manner (I "bought" some of it and was suspicious of other parts). Director/writer Haynes has done a great job of producing a feel to the whole film that compliments the story and, in turn, he has brought a great performance out of Moore. It is hard to ignore the general problem that the seeming "dull" delivery and lack of narrative punch will produce but I felt that the film had more than enough going for it as a whole to make up for such things.