IMDb >
The Avengers (1998)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsThe Avengers (1998) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 49 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 4 NEW) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
14 August 1998 (USA) moreTagline:
Mrs. Peel, we're needed. morePlot:
Two British agents (John Steed and Emma Peel) team up to stop Sir August De Wynter from destroying the world with a weather changing machine. full summary | add synopsisAwards:
1 win & 9 nominations moreNewsDesk:
(17 articles)
Uma Thurman Says Motherhood Is the ‘Best Kept Secret’ (From People - CelebrityBabies. 27 October 2009, 11:00 AM, PDT)
Uma Thurman to Walk Red Carpet For Opening Night of 45th Chicago International Film Festival
(From HollywoodChicago.com. 23 September 2009, 5:09 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
A wasted opportunity more (429 total)Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Ralph Fiennes | ... | John Steed | |
| Uma Thurman | ... | Emma Peel | |
| Sean Connery | ... | Sir August de Wynter | |
| Patrick Macnee | ... | Invisible Jones (voice) | |
| Jim Broadbent | ... | Mother | |
| Fiona Shaw | ... | Father | |
| Eddie Izzard | ... | Bailey | |
| Eileen Atkins | ... | Alice | |
| John Wood | ... | Trubshaw | |
| Carmen Ejogo | ... | Brenda | |
| Keeley Hawes | ... | Tamara | |
| Shaun Ryder | ... | Donavan | |
| Nicholas Woodeson | ... | Dr. Darling | |
| Michael Godley | ... | Butler | |
| Richard Lumsden | ... | Boodle's Porter |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Chapeau melon et bottes de cuir (Canada: French title) (France) (dubbed version) [fr]Los vengadores (Argentina) (video title) (Spain) [es]
Мстители (Russia) [ru]
Hämnarna (Sweden) [sv]
Mascevalci (Slovenia) [sl]
Me kostajat (Finland) [fi]
Me vakoojat (Finland) [fi]
Mit Schirm, Charme und Melone (Germany) [de]
Oi ekdikites (Greece) [el]
Os Vingadores (Brazil) [pt]
Razbunatorii (Romania) [ro]
Rewolwer i melonik (Poland) [pl]
Tatli sert (Turkey: Turkish title) [tr]
The avengers - Agenti speciali (Italy) [it]
The avengers - Hævnere i kjole og hvidt (Denmark) [da]
more
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for brief strong language.Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
87 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
Color (Technicolor)Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 moreCertification:
Philippines:G | Canada:PG (Ontario) | South Korea:12 | Argentina:13 | Australia:PG | Finland:K-12 | France:U | Germany:12 | Iceland:10 (original rating) | Iceland:12 (video rating) | Netherlands:12 | Portugal:M/12 | Singapore:PG | Spain:T | Sweden:11 | Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) | UK:12 | USA:PG-13 (certificate #36085)Filming Locations:
Albert R. Broccoli 007 Stage, Pinewood Studios, Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire, England, UK moreFun Stuff
Trivia:
The original release date was June 26th, 1998. After poor test screenings, the film was pushed back to August 14 1998 and the June spot was filled in by A Perfect Murder (1998). moreGoofs:
Audio/visual unsynchronized: When Emma Peel plays the piano, none of the dampers inside the piano moves up and down. Even though we discover it's a player piano, the dampers would still move every time a key is depressed. The only time the keys are in sync with the sound is in the final closeup as the Chopin piece ends. moreSoundtrack:
SOLVE MY PROBLEMS TODAY moreFAQ
Was this film meant to be satiric in some way? Or was it just a bad film?more
more (429 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Avengers (1998) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| GoldenEye | The World Is Not Enough | Wild Wild West | Thunderball | Dick Tracy Returns |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Action section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |















Is The Avengers a good film? No. Is it the worst film ever made? No. I first saw the movie at the cinema upon its release and, at that time, I did think that it was one of the worst films I'd seen up to that point. I've watched it 2 or 3 times since then and my opinion of it has improved, well, very slightly at any rate. Apart from a pervading incoherence, I think the film's major problem is its slightness; it's only an hour and a half long and the plot is very simplistic to say the least. It's not hard to imagine audiences feeling a bit short-changed when it first came out, especially as the film was a big-budget, would-be summer blockbuster. Another big problem is the casting of Uma Thurman as Emma Peel. Thurman has shown herself to be a fine actress in movies such as Pulp Fiction but she just looks out of her depth here (I never believed in her as a top-level scientist for a second) and her English accent doesn't sound natural. Nicole Kidman, to whom the role was first offered, would surely have been better, in particular, she's displayed flawless English accents in films such as The Others and The Hours. An English actress I also think would have made a great Peel is Joely Richardson but the studio would probably have vetoed such a choice on the grounds of her not being a big enough name. Ralph Fiennes was a real enigma in this film - there was nothing wrong in principle in casting him as Steed but he looks ill at ease throughout the movie as if he's rather be elsewhere. I can only assume he'd already twigged that the film was going to be a turkey. What's worse, Fiennes and Thurman have absolutely no chemistry between them, which wastes the snappy dialogue they have with each other throughout the film. The supporting cast fare a bit better with seasoned pros such as Sean Connery, Jim Broadbent and Fiona Shaw making the most of their underdeveloped parts. The retro-chic world of the original TV series is nicely recreated and there's no shortage of nice cars, costumes and locations but what's good about the film is easily drowned out by what's bad; The Avengers is ultimately a shallow, rushed and messy affair, severely hampered by the performances of its two leads. Handled properly, the film could have been a wonderful success for all concerned, the first chapter of an entertaining and lucrative franchise, stretching well beyond the 1990s; instead it's one of the most embarrassing flops of that decade. The original cut of the film was apparently two and a half hours long but, following negative reactions from audiences at test screenings, the studio hacked the film down to its present one and a half hour length. This doesn't actually come as much of a surprise as there is a lack of proper narrative flow to the film suggestive of chunks of explanatory scenes having been cut out. Just one example: towards the end of the film, just before they enter Sir August's underwater lair, Steed and Peel enter a phone box and Peel says "how now brown cow?" down the phone. The phrase seems to be a password to enter the premises but how does Peel know it? There's been talk here and there of the possibility of Warners releasing a director's cut or special edition DVD, restoring the original two and a half hour version. I think this would be a good idea and I'd definitely be interested in watching the full version of the film. It's highly unlikely to be any kind of masterpiece but it's difficult to imagine that it wouldn't improve upon the movie as it stands. At the very least you'd have to assume that it would be more coherent. Sadly I don't think the chances of Warners going down this line are high; I have the feeling that this is a movie the studio would rather forget about than draw attention to.