IMDb >
Fantastic Four (2005)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsFantastic Four (2005) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 79 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 24) |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers (WGA):
Release Date:
8 July 2005 (USA)
more
Tagline:
4 times the action. 4 times the adventure. 4 times the fantastic. more
Plot:
A group of astronauts gain superpowers after a cosmic radiation exposure and must use them to oppose the plans of their enemy, Doctor Victor Von Doom full summary | add synopsis
Plot Keywords:
Awards:
11 nominations
more
NewsDesk:
(582 articles)
Sony unveils PSP comics publishers
(From digitalspy. 27 November 2009, 10:25 AM, PST)
Anyone Wants Another Amityville Remake? No? The Weinsteins Do…
(From HeyUGuys. 26 November 2009, 1:11 PM, PST)
(From digitalspy. 27 November 2009, 10:25 AM, PST)
Anyone Wants Another Amityville Remake? No? The Weinsteins Do…
(From HeyUGuys. 26 November 2009, 1:11 PM, PST)
User Comments:
The title is half right
more (989 total)
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only) more
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Fantastic 4 (USA) (alternative spelling)
Fantastic Four (Germany)
Les quatre fantastiques (Canada: French title) (France) [fr]
Los 4 fantásticos (Argentina) (Peru) [es]
Fantastic Four (Greece) [el]
Fantasticna cetvorka (Croatia) [hr]
Fantasticna cetvorka (Serbia) [sr]
Fantastik dörtlü (Turkey: Turkish title) [tr]
I fantastici 4 (Italy) [it]
Los cuatro fantásticos (Spain) [es]
Quarteto Fantástico (Brazil) [pt]
more
Fantastic Four (Germany)
Les quatre fantastiques (Canada: French title) (France) [fr]
Los 4 fantásticos (Argentina) (Peru) [es]
Fantastic Four (Greece) [el]
Fantasticna cetvorka (Croatia) [hr]
Fantasticna cetvorka (Serbia) [sr]
Fantastik dörtlü (Turkey: Turkish title) [tr]
I fantastici 4 (Italy) [it]
Los cuatro fantásticos (Spain) [es]
Quarteto Fantástico (Brazil) [pt]
more
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action, and some suggestive content.
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
106 min | USA:125 min (extended edition)
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Certification:
Taiwan:GP |
Iceland:10 |
Iceland:LH (video rating) |
Malaysia:U |
USA:PG-13 (certificate #41765) |
Canada:G (Quebec) |
Canada:PG (Alberta/British Columbia/Manitoba/Nova Scotia/Ontario) |
Germany:12 |
Singapore:PG |
UK:PG |
Mexico:B |
Australia:M |
Finland:K-11 |
Sweden:11 |
South Korea:12 |
Hong Kong:IIA |
Philippines:PG-13 |
Ireland:PG |
Australia:PG (re-rating on appeal) |
Mexico:A |
Argentina:13 |
Peru:14 |
Norway:11 |
Brazil:10 |
Australia:PG (re-rating) |
Switzerland:10 (canton of Vaud) |
Switzerland:10 (canton of Geneva)
Filming Locations:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Reed's smart phone, which he uses to control the holographic presentation at the beginning of the movie, is a Samsung SPH-i700 on Verizon. Verizon was a marketing partner for the film.
more
Goofs:
Continuity: As Von Doom is watching Mr. Fantastic on his monitors as he's doing the equations on the blackboards, the final underlined statement is already on the board - then Mr. Fantastic goes and writes it on the board, underlines it, and retracts his arm.
more
Quotes:
Movie Connections:
Referenced in Sin City: The Premiere (2005) (TV)
more
Soundtrack:
Come On, Come In
more
FAQ
A NOTE REGARDING SPOILERSWas Leonard killed?
What are the differences between the theatrical version and the Extended Cut?
more
more (989 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Fantastic Four (2005) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer | Spider-Man | Spider-Man 2 | Superman | King of the Rocket Men |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Action section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |
















In that there are Four of them. But Fantastic? More like "Mediocre", or "Barely Adequate", or "Contractually Sufficient".
For once, the reviewers were right. This film is a big, rambling, poorly conceived, sloppily scripted, shoddily acted pile of orange rubble. Avoid it, or suffer the consequences.
It's hard to know where to begin, there's so much wrong with it. For a start, the acting "talent" is AWOL. TV performers don't inevitably get lost on the big screen, but this cadre evited it. Alba turns in the exact same performance that she always does, going through her entire range, from "pouty and petulant" to "petulant and pouty". Evans is either a strutting superannuated fratboy poseur, or for some reason is deliberately playing one so well that it's hard to tell the difference - either way, his character is thoroughly irritating and utterly unsympathetic. Chiklis is adequate, but is let down by the plain fact that he's a round little man in a big rubber muscle suit. This was a role for Ron Perlman, not Wimpy. Gruffudd is a huge disappointment; he has no screen presence, and his slightly out-of-his-depth portrayal of Hornblower is apparently the man, not the character. It would have been better if he had been invisible, as he manages to fade into the background with ease in every scene. McMahon is the only actor who appears to be enjoying himself, but as he's barely in the film, he can't rescue it.
The script was apparently in development for ten years. I can't see why, as it's one scene, repeated ten times. If this is the refined version, I shudder to imagine what the raw cut would have been like. I find it hard to believe that the lines were written by, or for, adults. There's no real plot to the film, or even a story beyond "Nasty self absorbed un-credible astronauts become nasty self absorbed un-credible 'super' heroes, then argue with each other for a while, take their clothes off for no reason, then beat up some poor disfigured guy apparently because he didn't join their little gang, roll credits." Direction and cinematography was Filmschool #101, the score was instantly forgettable, and the editing was appalling, with the pacing in particular being random and rushed.
The effects were only what we've come to expect from a hundred million dollar movie, which brings me to the big question: what on earth did they spend all that money on? It wasn't on the "talent", either on-screen or off, it certainly wasn't on the rubber suit, and the effects couldn't have cost that much - or if they did, they were seriously over-charged.
I have an idea where at least some of the budget went. From IMDb's Trivia section: "Contains over 25 cameos from real life employees of Fox television affiliates." And I strongly suspect that the IMDb records for this movie contain about 2,5000 comments and ratings and mutual approvals from about five of those real life employees. Reading the top recommended comments, most of which have 10 ratings, reveals a depressing pattern of almost identically styled raves from the likes of "top10dude" and "BigTenPower" with embarrassingly obvious track records of enthusing about, you guessed it, other shoddy Fox movies. When someone rates Elektra a 10, you have to just snort in disbelief at the audacity of it.
I guess it's a pretty good investment for Fox, but this kind of astroturfing drastically reduces the usefulness of IMDb as an early review source. With time, this awful, foul mess of a movie will no doubt settle to its rightful place near the bottom of the ratings pile, but it's likely that the shill reviews will stay stubbornly at the top of the recommended pile for a long time to come. Beware; consider the source.