IMDb >
U-571 (2000)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at
blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
blockbuster.com
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsU-571 (2000) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 44 | slideshow) | Videos |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
21 April 2000 (USA) moreTagline:
You won't come up for air until it's over! morePlot:
A German submarine is boarded by disguised American submariners trying to capture their Enigma cipher machine. full summary | add synopsisAwards:
Won Oscar. Another 2 wins & 9 nominations moreNewsDesk:
(34 articles)
Trailer for Surrogates online (From Twitch. 23 May 2009, 3:51 PM, PDT)
‘Surrogates’ HD trailer with Bruce Willis
(From The Cinema Post. 21 May 2009, 3:06 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
Great Action Film moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Matthew McConaughey | ... | Lt. Andrew Tyler, Executive Officer | |
| Bill Paxton | ... | Lt. Cmdr. Mike Dahlgren | |
| Harvey Keitel | ... | CPO Henry Klough | |
| Jon Bon Jovi | ... | Lt. Pete Emmett, Chief Engineer | |
| David Keith | ... | Maj. Matthew Coonan, USMC, Office of Naval Intelligence | |
| Thomas Kretschmann | ... | Capt.-Lt. Gunther Wassner | |
| Jake Weber | ... | Lt. Hirsch, USNR | |
| Jack Noseworthy | ... | Seaman Bill Wentz, Radioman | |
| Tom Guiry | ... | Seaman Ted 'Trigger' Fitzgerald, Radioman | |
| Will Estes | ... | Seaman Ronald 'Rabbit' Parker, Torpedoman | |
| Terrence 'T.C.' Carson | ... | Steward Eddie Carson | |
| Erik Palladino | ... | Seaman Anthony Mazzola, Planesman | |
| Dave Power | ... | Seaman Charles 'Tank' Clemens, Machinist Mate | |
| Derk Cheetwood | ... | Seaman Herb Griggs, Helmsman | |
| Matthew Settle | ... | Ens. Keith Larson, Chief Torpedoman |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
U-571 (France)Submarino U-571 (Portugal) [pt]
U-571 (Turkey: Turkish title) [tr]
U-571 (Spain) [es]
U-571 (Germany) [de]
U-571 (Canada: French title) [fr]
U-571 (Denmark) [da]
U-571 - A Batalha do Atlântico (Brazil) [pt]
U-571: La batalla del Atlántico (Venezuela) [es]
more
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for war violence.Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
116 minColor:
ColorAspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 moreCertification:
Canada:14 (Nova Scotia) (original rating) | Canada:PG (Nova Scotia) (re-rating on appeal) | Canada:PG (Ontario) | Iceland:14 (original rating) | Iceland:16 (video rating) | Brazil:14 | Argentina:13 | Australia:M | Chile:14 | Denmark:15 | Finland:K-14 | France:U | Germany:16 | Hong Kong:IIB | Ireland:15 | Netherlands:12 | New Zealand:M | Norway:15 | Portugal:M/12 | Spain:7 | Sweden:11 | Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) | UK:12 | USA:PG-13 | South Korea:12 | Singapore:PG | Philippines:PG-13Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Coincidentally, 571 was the numerical designation of the U.S.S. Nautilus, launched in 1954, the first nuclear submarine. moreGoofs:
Anachronisms: When the shipyard is working on the 33 boat, one of the shipyard workers is clearly seen using a present day yellow DeWalt grinder. moreQuotes:
Ens. Keith Larson, Chief Torpedoman: They wouldn't give me five minutes to consumate my marriage. Five minutes! moreSoundtrack:
My Heart Stood Still moreFAQ
Is this a historically accurate film?more
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for U-571 (2000) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Mission: Impossible II | Miracle at St. Anna | Valkyrie | The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen | Babylon A.D. |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Action section | IMDb France section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |













I saw U-571 last Friday.
I loved every second of it. Throughout the movie, I don't know who's knuckles were whiter; mine clutching the theatre seat, or the actors who grabbed whatever they could while being depth-charged.
This movie was pure non-stop action, from beginning to end. You are there, really there, experiencing the gripping fear of submarine warfare.
I believe that was the intention of the movie and if so, accomplished that superbly. I think the acting, camera work, and sound was excellent.
Now, regarding other issues.
The movie is NOT historical; it is fictional. It is based (loosely) on history (history being that there once were German and Allied submarines that fought in a war known as World War II, and that there was a German code machine the Allies called the "enigma").
Not only is it not historical regarding the event (the capturing of U-571 and the enigma code machine by Americans) but in many other areas such as what submarines of that era and their weapons could and could not do (such as dogfighting underwater with torpedo's).
Don't look for character development either. There isn't much. It's more like the first 1/2 hour of "Saving Private Ryan" (the landing on the beach episode ) throughout the length of the movie.
Thankfully, in my opinion of what a "war" movie should be, it was not muddled up with "love" scenes or anything stupid and mushy like most are. And also, thankfully, there wasn't "angel music" playing all the time. The second "trailer" was misleading in that it showed a ball-room dance, leading the viewer to believe there was some "love" interests, and played angel music, of which there was neither in the movie. It was just man-to-man combat and basic survival.
I hope everyone who sees it will enjoy it for what it is and not concentrate on, or blame it for what it isn't.
Enough analyzing -- Go see it! I suggest choosing a modern theatre with a big-screen and digital sound system.
Salut!
JG2"FireCat!