48 out of 69 people found the following comment useful :- After Four Years Of Watching, A Handful Of Observations, 11 December 2006
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from Lockport, NY, United States
Well, by now I have watched four years of this show, along with five
years of the first CSI and two years of CSI-New York....and I could say
a lot but will try to condense my thoughts to just a handful of
opinions, namely:
1 - This is the best-looking of the three CSI series on DVD. All of
them look great on disc but the colors in here are the boldest and the
most spectacular of any. Each episode is a tremendous visual treat.
2 - I know David Caruso is a controversial topic among CSI fans because
of the way he delivers his lines, but I personally find it great. It's
so outrageous it's fun. Sometimes I just laugh. Hey, it makes him
different from William Petersen (CSI: Vegas) and Gary Sinise (CSI: NY).
I may be in the minority but I enjoy Caruso's overly dramatic delivery.
3 - This series has gotten better and better. I had some doubts the
first year. It didn't seem half as good as the Las Vegas show, but it
has improved significantly and I now rate it higher than the original
CSI.
4 - As a guy I appreciate all the beautiful Miami women in this show,
and there are tons of them, but I also think the show is geared more
toward the 20-something crowd which leaves me out, being considerably
older than that. Too many of these "kids" are sleazy, too, but that's
what leads to problems and crimes.
5 - All the supporting actors on the show are good, too, as they are in
all the CSI shows. I was sorry to see Rory Cochrane ("Tim Speedle")
quit and hope we don't lose any more of the "team."
83 out of 141 people found the following comment useful :- Superior To The Original, 23 September 2005
Author:
bldsimple2 from Encino, CA
I'm gonna get creamed with e-mails from fans of the original CSI show,
but I can't help it. In my opinion, CSI: Miami is superior to the
original and a good foundation for (the also superior) CSI:NY.
Don't get me wrong, the original is the original, but the fact that the
real Miami/Dade CSI's are cops first allows this show to explode in
gunfire at any moment...and place our lead, David Caruso, at the center
of the action. Now I want to make something clear: Almost 15 years ago
I saw some of Caruso's early work and I was trying to figure out what
all the fuss was about. What makes THIS guy a sex symbol (on NYPD
Blue)? Then, just as fast as he becomes a major star, he exits Blue,
makes two movies that bombed (the really good "Kiss Of Death" and the
laughable "Jade") and he's suddenly poison. It was after seeing Caruso
in Kiss of Death and a previous film, The King of New York" that I
realized we were missing one of the last REAL tough guys.
CSI: Miami has brought him back. Caruso spearheads this show with a
vengeance. Sure his line readings have their own stilted rhythm, but he
did the same thing on NYPD Blue and people loved him then. Caruso with
a gun in his hand looks more natural than anything else I have seen on
TV (and my favorite show is The Shield).
CSI: Miami is action packed. The stories are seedier. The
cinematography is unmatched by any other show. Go watch the DVDs. Tune
in Monday nights. I swear, you'll be a convert.
Then go watch Gary Sinise give the performance of his life in CSI:NY.
You'll be glad you did.
40 out of 64 people found the following comment useful :- Entertaining show that presents itself more in Style than in Content, 27 February 2005
Author:
Elson321 from United Kingdom
CSI Miami is an entertaining show that really has picked up David
Caruso's career up from the Ocean floor. He is very blessed, indeed, to
be experiencing success as a lead actor on a famous show since his NYPD
Blue days.
CSI Miami is more about style than content. Compared to CSI: Las Vegas,
CSI Miami is inferior. However, after watching it from the very first
episode, and until 2004, i was hooked. It did grow on me. It's darker
story lines than CSI: LV, =sunny settings, a cast that gels together
made it different in a good way to CSI:LV. Plus i loved the way
Caruso's Caine knows everything.as wlel as his emotional attachment and
sympathy to the victims of crime.
A major downer since 2004 has been Rory Cochrane's absence in the show.
He was a great character who was cool looking and had smart one-liners.
Without him the show is a tad bit more empty.
The show is currently waring off me, and I am starting to find CSI:NY
much more appealing. I will continue to watch CSI: Miami but not expect
as much from it as I did before.
My score (2007 onwards) = 3/5
61 out of 107 people found the following comment useful :- Not as good as the original, 10 August 2004
Author:
oddtoddnm from Albuquerque, NM
CSI: Miami is a fun show to watch, like the original CSI:. But the
chemistry in the original isn't quite there.
Grissom, in CSI:, is interesting, deep, and can easily be believed to
be as smart as he is. But Horatio in CSI: Miami seems a bit more flat,
and his bright moments seem cheesy and scripted.
Other characters don't seem to grow in CSI: Miami, while there's clear
changes in their CSI: counterparts. Also, the side stories are more
interesting in CSI: than in CSI: Miami.
So, while I'll watch CSI: Miami, it's not growing on me like how the
original did.
33 out of 55 people found the following comment useful :- Caruso Shines, 29 March 2004
Author:
RC Copeland from Canada
The redhead that looks at the floor as he talks to his suspects. A
brilliant trademark for a very well written show. From the opening crime
catching scene and into a great 'screaming', remix of The Who's 'Won't Get
Fooled again' open credit sequence, to David Caruso's great acting, this
show is worth at least an hour of your time each week. Caruso makes the
show. He's great to watch as he throws simple single line hooks into his
suspects & catches them off guard with the forensic evidence his team
gathers. We got a glimpse of this guy in 'NYPD Blue' as he played
Detective John Kelly, but Caruso has been a good actor for a very long
time. From 'Proof Of Life' to William Friedkin's 'Jade' to Barbet
Schroeder's 'Kiss Of Death', Caruso has been an actor that has come into his
own. If you have an opportunity to see 'First Blood' you will get to see
Caruso as he plays a young Deputy showing compassion to Sylvester
Stallone's character. The same compassion that he now shows in CSI:M to
victims that are not able to help themselves. A welcome relief to today's
hardened Hollywood leading dramatic actors roles that show no empathy.
This is not to take away from the rest of the cast. They are good and hold
their own, however it's good that the lead actor shines as Caruso does.
Perhaps an Emmy is not out of the question.
25 out of 40 people found the following comment useful :- Baywatch meets CSI, 28 July 2007
Author:
chris_fodder from South Korea
I was a big fan of the original series (Las Vegas). Sadly this show
seems to be nothing more than beautiful actors and cinematography. I
won't lie to you, the actors are hot, and the scenery is awesome. Thats
why i gave it a whopping 2/10. Nothing else grabbed me though.
Weak plot lines and character interactions. This show takes a bold leap
from reality. Characters are strutting around the art-deco police
station in their designer cloths. The capers they solve have HUGE plot
holes and are very formulaic. There's always a quick fix at the end of
the show to wrap things up.
Mostly I was disappointed by the content (lack thereof).
It's eye candy.....nothing more.
28 out of 46 people found the following comment useful :- A show you shouldn't miss!, 8 September 2004
Author:
Patricia Barratt (olive_oil56) from Manchester England
I have watched this show from the very beginning, and wouldn't miss a
single episode for anything in the world. The cast are the best.
The writer has certainly got an unbelievable talent, and how he comes
to his conclusions is just beyond me. I never miss an episode, and I
tape each show, along with Law & Order, which is another great show. It
shows on Saturdays and Tuesdays here in England. David Caruso, well,
he's my idol, he is so sweet and shy looking, He is a brilliant actor.
Each case is detailed and examined, and the results are just
outstanding. C.S.I.Miami is one if my favorites I have even looked up
each character on the Internet and got a better insight to them all. I
hope they keep turning out more shows.
Keep it up Guys!
12 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- Horatio Caine and his crime-fighting sunglasses, 30 August 2007
Author:
Diogenes81
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
The original CSI, at the beginning, was fun (before we got love stories
shoved down the throats of the viewers or victims dressed in raccoon
costumes). Preposterous, maybe, but entertaining, and based on an
original idea; a "different" cop show.
CSI Miami, on the other hand, has all the flaws of the original CSI -
like a penchant for overly implausible situations - without the
strengths - like interesting and likable characters and gripping story
lines.
Emily Procter, Adam Rodriguez and the other secondary character are
uninteresting; the best was by far Rory Cochrane as the moody Speedle,
who of course was the first one to go (after Kim Delaney, whose
character, thankfully, was quickly written off).
However, the core of the show is David Caruso, who gives an unspeakably
terrible turn as the smug Horatio Caine; Horatio chews the scenery
shamelessly, acts like a demigod, and is in general so obnoxious,
overblown and outrageously excessive that the viewer doesn't know
whether to incredulously shake his head or to laugh at the sheer
absurdity of this performance.
If you want to give a try to the "CSI" series, go for the first seasons
of the original, Las Vegas.
4/10
14 out of 19 people found the following comment useful :- Best comedy on TV, 24 October 2004
Author:
obiwan-27 (obiwan@ghosts.org) from New England
How has CSI: Miami not picked up an Emmy for best comedy? It has
everything--hilarious dialog, slapstick hijinx (when Horatio grabs the
perps by their shirt collars), trademark moves (sunglasses), a
comforting formulaic plot, and a ditzy blonde foil in skimpy clothes.
Not since THREE'S COMPANY have we seen such a successful blending of
the basic elements of comedy.
The funniest part of CSI: Miami by far is David Caruso. This guy was
born to play the comedic straight man. He has his delivery and
mannerisms down so well that I laugh uncontrollably every time he
utters a line or removes his sunglasses. In one recent episode he even
got a "non-English-speaking" Romanian man to speak perfect
English--hilariously, of course--simply by throwing him around a
little. Kramer, step aside. Horatio Cane is the funnyman of the new
millennium. Mark my words, soon "yadda yadda yadda" will be replaced by
"Thiiiiiisss... looks like A... MUURRRder" in the lexicon of the
American public.
Of course, every comedian needs a good supporting cast. Fortunately,
Emily Procter (Chrissy) and Khandi[!!] Alexander (Janet) are more than
up to the challenge of providing laughs week after week. Even their
character names--Calleigh and Alexx--are designed to provoke chuckles
and highlight the brilliant absurdity of their roles. Khandi Alexander
deserves a special mention for keeping a straight face while she talks
to the corpses she is dissecting. Now that's comedy. I expect her to
drop a junior mint into one of their chest cavities anytime now.
I was saddened at "Speed"'s recent departure as he was such an
essential part of the show (following Adam Rodriguez around with a prop
box is a REALLY important duty). However, his replacement is nearly as
useless, a lot cuter, and has far more potential for high comedy, so
I'm not worried. Besides, Speed's final moments generated "master of my
domain" levels of hilarity, so it was all worth it.
The only thing about this show that's serious is Adam Rodriguez, who is
SERIOUSLY hot. I'd gladly watch a weekly one-hour drama called
RODRIGUEZ WRITES HIS SHOPPING LIST. This needs to happen. And why not?
I mean, if shows like SEVENTH HEAVEN are still on...
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- What I dislike most of it is ..., 1 February 2008
Author:
Simeon Vlahov from Sofia, Bulgaria
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
That this show is simply a show, something that is meant to entertain
and not to make you think. This is done American way - as simple as
possible, as impossible as possible, as predictable as possible, as
easy to swallow as possible. Do not and I repeat DO NOT confuse it with
the original series. This is crap to anyone with more than 2 brain
cells of use. The scriptwriters must've been recruited from a primary
school - we cannot otherwise explain the lack of originality and the
whole world of errors that emerge in every single episode. Clues that
appears as soon as they're needed, always stupid suspects that A) are
awaiting for the cops to come and arrest them; or/and B) leaving
crucial evidence of a crime in the crime scene so mighty Horatio (which
is loathsome mockery with the Shakespeare's immortal Hamlet) can
interfere. He is always right, he is carrying head always climbed right
so he can look more intelligent, he is carrying gun with intention to
use it in every possible moment, the feelings of fear are unknown to
him. There are no such things as corrupt cops and always and I mean
really always the suspect is found and captured at the end with
absolutely the right decision. The suspect always confess at the end,
showing every possible remorse a suspect can give, leaving nothing to
the judges to prove just because of the wonderful Horatio's job done.
The evil is punished and the children may now go to bed. An ideal
world, isn't it? The reality - there are plenty of wrong convicted
persons serving time s in prison for crimes they do not commit. Showing
ideal world does not help the society as whole for wrong hopes can do
more harm than just showing crimes.
I wouldn't be so critical if this hadn't been taken itself so
seriously.
Something to avoid. Stick to the original series, at least they do have
more accomplished writers.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsepisode listepisodes castepisode ratings... by rating... by votestv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsrecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
"CSI: Miami" (2002)
48 out of 69 people found the following comment useful :-

After Four Years Of Watching, A Handful Of Observations, 11 December 2006
Author: ccthemovieman-1 from Lockport, NY, United States
Well, by now I have watched four years of this show, along with five years of the first CSI and two years of CSI-New York....and I could say a lot but will try to condense my thoughts to just a handful of opinions, namely:
1 - This is the best-looking of the three CSI series on DVD. All of them look great on disc but the colors in here are the boldest and the most spectacular of any. Each episode is a tremendous visual treat.
2 - I know David Caruso is a controversial topic among CSI fans because of the way he delivers his lines, but I personally find it great. It's so outrageous it's fun. Sometimes I just laugh. Hey, it makes him different from William Petersen (CSI: Vegas) and Gary Sinise (CSI: NY). I may be in the minority but I enjoy Caruso's overly dramatic delivery.
3 - This series has gotten better and better. I had some doubts the first year. It didn't seem half as good as the Las Vegas show, but it has improved significantly and I now rate it higher than the original CSI.
4 - As a guy I appreciate all the beautiful Miami women in this show, and there are tons of them, but I also think the show is geared more toward the 20-something crowd which leaves me out, being considerably older than that. Too many of these "kids" are sleazy, too, but that's what leads to problems and crimes.
5 - All the supporting actors on the show are good, too, as they are in all the CSI shows. I was sorry to see Rory Cochrane ("Tim Speedle") quit and hope we don't lose any more of the "team."
83 out of 141 people found the following comment useful :-
Superior To The Original, 23 September 2005
Author: bldsimple2 from Encino, CA
I'm gonna get creamed with e-mails from fans of the original CSI show, but I can't help it. In my opinion, CSI: Miami is superior to the original and a good foundation for (the also superior) CSI:NY.
Don't get me wrong, the original is the original, but the fact that the real Miami/Dade CSI's are cops first allows this show to explode in gunfire at any moment...and place our lead, David Caruso, at the center of the action. Now I want to make something clear: Almost 15 years ago I saw some of Caruso's early work and I was trying to figure out what all the fuss was about. What makes THIS guy a sex symbol (on NYPD Blue)? Then, just as fast as he becomes a major star, he exits Blue, makes two movies that bombed (the really good "Kiss Of Death" and the laughable "Jade") and he's suddenly poison. It was after seeing Caruso in Kiss of Death and a previous film, The King of New York" that I realized we were missing one of the last REAL tough guys.
CSI: Miami has brought him back. Caruso spearheads this show with a vengeance. Sure his line readings have their own stilted rhythm, but he did the same thing on NYPD Blue and people loved him then. Caruso with a gun in his hand looks more natural than anything else I have seen on TV (and my favorite show is The Shield).
CSI: Miami is action packed. The stories are seedier. The cinematography is unmatched by any other show. Go watch the DVDs. Tune in Monday nights. I swear, you'll be a convert.
Then go watch Gary Sinise give the performance of his life in CSI:NY. You'll be glad you did.
40 out of 64 people found the following comment useful :-

Entertaining show that presents itself more in Style than in Content, 27 February 2005
Author: Elson321 from United Kingdom
CSI Miami is an entertaining show that really has picked up David Caruso's career up from the Ocean floor. He is very blessed, indeed, to be experiencing success as a lead actor on a famous show since his NYPD Blue days.
CSI Miami is more about style than content. Compared to CSI: Las Vegas, CSI Miami is inferior. However, after watching it from the very first episode, and until 2004, i was hooked. It did grow on me. It's darker story lines than CSI: LV, =sunny settings, a cast that gels together made it different in a good way to CSI:LV. Plus i loved the way Caruso's Caine knows everything.as wlel as his emotional attachment and sympathy to the victims of crime.
A major downer since 2004 has been Rory Cochrane's absence in the show. He was a great character who was cool looking and had smart one-liners. Without him the show is a tad bit more empty.
The show is currently waring off me, and I am starting to find CSI:NY much more appealing. I will continue to watch CSI: Miami but not expect as much from it as I did before.
My score (2007 onwards) = 3/5
61 out of 107 people found the following comment useful :-
Not as good as the original, 10 August 2004
Author: oddtoddnm from Albuquerque, NM
CSI: Miami is a fun show to watch, like the original CSI:. But the chemistry in the original isn't quite there.
Grissom, in CSI:, is interesting, deep, and can easily be believed to be as smart as he is. But Horatio in CSI: Miami seems a bit more flat, and his bright moments seem cheesy and scripted.
Other characters don't seem to grow in CSI: Miami, while there's clear changes in their CSI: counterparts. Also, the side stories are more interesting in CSI: than in CSI: Miami.
So, while I'll watch CSI: Miami, it's not growing on me like how the original did.
33 out of 55 people found the following comment useful :-
Caruso Shines, 29 March 2004
Author: RC Copeland from Canada
The redhead that looks at the floor as he talks to his suspects. A brilliant trademark for a very well written show. From the opening crime catching scene and into a great 'screaming', remix of The Who's 'Won't Get Fooled again' open credit sequence, to David Caruso's great acting, this show is worth at least an hour of your time each week. Caruso makes the show. He's great to watch as he throws simple single line hooks into his suspects & catches them off guard with the forensic evidence his team gathers. We got a glimpse of this guy in 'NYPD Blue' as he played Detective John Kelly, but Caruso has been a good actor for a very long time. From 'Proof Of Life' to William Friedkin's 'Jade' to Barbet Schroeder's 'Kiss Of Death', Caruso has been an actor that has come into his own. If you have an opportunity to see 'First Blood' you will get to see Caruso as he plays a young Deputy showing compassion to Sylvester Stallone's character. The same compassion that he now shows in CSI:M to victims that are not able to help themselves. A welcome relief to today's hardened Hollywood leading dramatic actors roles that show no empathy.
This is not to take away from the rest of the cast. They are good and hold their own, however it's good that the lead actor shines as Caruso does. Perhaps an Emmy is not out of the question.
25 out of 40 people found the following comment useful :-

Baywatch meets CSI, 28 July 2007
Author: chris_fodder from South Korea
I was a big fan of the original series (Las Vegas). Sadly this show seems to be nothing more than beautiful actors and cinematography. I won't lie to you, the actors are hot, and the scenery is awesome. Thats why i gave it a whopping 2/10. Nothing else grabbed me though.
Weak plot lines and character interactions. This show takes a bold leap from reality. Characters are strutting around the art-deco police station in their designer cloths. The capers they solve have HUGE plot holes and are very formulaic. There's always a quick fix at the end of the show to wrap things up.
Mostly I was disappointed by the content (lack thereof).
It's eye candy.....nothing more.
28 out of 46 people found the following comment useful :-
A show you shouldn't miss!, 8 September 2004
Author: Patricia Barratt (olive_oil56) from Manchester England
I have watched this show from the very beginning, and wouldn't miss a single episode for anything in the world. The cast are the best.
The writer has certainly got an unbelievable talent, and how he comes to his conclusions is just beyond me. I never miss an episode, and I tape each show, along with Law & Order, which is another great show. It shows on Saturdays and Tuesdays here in England. David Caruso, well, he's my idol, he is so sweet and shy looking, He is a brilliant actor. Each case is detailed and examined, and the results are just outstanding. C.S.I.Miami is one if my favorites I have even looked up each character on the Internet and got a better insight to them all. I hope they keep turning out more shows.
Keep it up Guys!
12 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

Horatio Caine and his crime-fighting sunglasses, 30 August 2007
Author: Diogenes81
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
The original CSI, at the beginning, was fun (before we got love stories shoved down the throats of the viewers or victims dressed in raccoon costumes). Preposterous, maybe, but entertaining, and based on an original idea; a "different" cop show.
CSI Miami, on the other hand, has all the flaws of the original CSI - like a penchant for overly implausible situations - without the strengths - like interesting and likable characters and gripping story lines.
Emily Procter, Adam Rodriguez and the other secondary character are uninteresting; the best was by far Rory Cochrane as the moody Speedle, who of course was the first one to go (after Kim Delaney, whose character, thankfully, was quickly written off).
However, the core of the show is David Caruso, who gives an unspeakably terrible turn as the smug Horatio Caine; Horatio chews the scenery shamelessly, acts like a demigod, and is in general so obnoxious, overblown and outrageously excessive that the viewer doesn't know whether to incredulously shake his head or to laugh at the sheer absurdity of this performance.
If you want to give a try to the "CSI" series, go for the first seasons of the original, Las Vegas.
4/10
14 out of 19 people found the following comment useful :-
Best comedy on TV, 24 October 2004
Author: obiwan-27 (obiwan@ghosts.org) from New England
How has CSI: Miami not picked up an Emmy for best comedy? It has everything--hilarious dialog, slapstick hijinx (when Horatio grabs the perps by their shirt collars), trademark moves (sunglasses), a comforting formulaic plot, and a ditzy blonde foil in skimpy clothes. Not since THREE'S COMPANY have we seen such a successful blending of the basic elements of comedy.
The funniest part of CSI: Miami by far is David Caruso. This guy was born to play the comedic straight man. He has his delivery and mannerisms down so well that I laugh uncontrollably every time he utters a line or removes his sunglasses. In one recent episode he even got a "non-English-speaking" Romanian man to speak perfect English--hilariously, of course--simply by throwing him around a little. Kramer, step aside. Horatio Cane is the funnyman of the new millennium. Mark my words, soon "yadda yadda yadda" will be replaced by "Thiiiiiisss... looks like A... MUURRRder" in the lexicon of the American public.
Of course, every comedian needs a good supporting cast. Fortunately, Emily Procter (Chrissy) and Khandi[!!] Alexander (Janet) are more than up to the challenge of providing laughs week after week. Even their character names--Calleigh and Alexx--are designed to provoke chuckles and highlight the brilliant absurdity of their roles. Khandi Alexander deserves a special mention for keeping a straight face while she talks to the corpses she is dissecting. Now that's comedy. I expect her to drop a junior mint into one of their chest cavities anytime now.
I was saddened at "Speed"'s recent departure as he was such an essential part of the show (following Adam Rodriguez around with a prop box is a REALLY important duty). However, his replacement is nearly as useless, a lot cuter, and has far more potential for high comedy, so I'm not worried. Besides, Speed's final moments generated "master of my domain" levels of hilarity, so it was all worth it.
The only thing about this show that's serious is Adam Rodriguez, who is SERIOUSLY hot. I'd gladly watch a weekly one-hour drama called RODRIGUEZ WRITES HIS SHOPPING LIST. This needs to happen. And why not? I mean, if shows like SEVENTH HEAVEN are still on...
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

What I dislike most of it is ..., 1 February 2008
Author: Simeon Vlahov from Sofia, Bulgaria
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
That this show is simply a show, something that is meant to entertain and not to make you think. This is done American way - as simple as possible, as impossible as possible, as predictable as possible, as easy to swallow as possible. Do not and I repeat DO NOT confuse it with the original series. This is crap to anyone with more than 2 brain cells of use. The scriptwriters must've been recruited from a primary school - we cannot otherwise explain the lack of originality and the whole world of errors that emerge in every single episode. Clues that appears as soon as they're needed, always stupid suspects that A) are awaiting for the cops to come and arrest them; or/and B) leaving crucial evidence of a crime in the crime scene so mighty Horatio (which is loathsome mockery with the Shakespeare's immortal Hamlet) can interfere. He is always right, he is carrying head always climbed right so he can look more intelligent, he is carrying gun with intention to use it in every possible moment, the feelings of fear are unknown to him. There are no such things as corrupt cops and always and I mean really always the suspect is found and captured at the end with absolutely the right decision. The suspect always confess at the end, showing every possible remorse a suspect can give, leaving nothing to the judges to prove just because of the wonderful Horatio's job done. The evil is punished and the children may now go to bed. An ideal world, isn't it? The reality - there are plenty of wrong convicted persons serving time s in prison for crimes they do not commit. Showing ideal world does not help the society as whole for wrong hopes can do more harm than just showing crimes.
I wouldn't be so critical if this hadn't been taken itself so seriously.
Something to avoid. Stick to the original series, at least they do have more accomplished writers.
Add another comment
Related Links