20 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :- Wrestling may be fake..., 5 January 2003
Author:
Krakker_Jakk
I haven't watch wrestling for years. I've grown out of it, but even today
when I hear others say, "Why do you watch wrestling? It's fake!" to others,
it still urks me. Being fake is no reason not to watch it. YES IT IS FAKE!
But so are sitcoms, soup operas, and just about every other TV (with the
exception of those "reality tv" shows, but even some of them are actually
fake). Only watch it to enjoy it. Don't let the fact that its fake sway the
way you feel about it. It's like not listening to a certain singer because
they are gay and letting that be the determining factor, even though they
make good music. So who cares if its fake? If a kid wants to believe its
real, then just let them. Why spoil the fun for someone?
13 out of 19 people found the following comment useful :- Underrated, this is the ''A'' show with wrestlers that can actually WRESTLE & ENTERTAIN!!!, 29 April 2005
Author:
CinemaLov (gilnor83@hotmail.com) from Québec, Canada
Unlike Monday nights, Smackdown brings the wrestling in their program.
In the past, they got all the greatest wrestlers, legends, stars of
tomorrow such as Randy Orton, Batista, Rey Mysterio, Lashley, Kid Kash,
Mexicools, Paul London, Matt Hardy, Hardcore Holly, JBL, Booker T.,
Chris Benoit, and sometimes The Undertaker PLUS the future of this
sport in The Boogeyman (strange dude), Stacy Keibler, Orlando Jordan,
MNM, Sylvan... but even now, the roster is brilliant !
I can't get enough of 2 hours, 2 hours is not enough for such a good
show. I am a wrestling fan and it's the reason why I love so much
Smackdown and dislike RAW since 2002 because all the entertaining,
wrestling and interesting story lines are.
Smackdown is the total package, sometimes it have his ups & downs but
right now since Wrestlemania, the show is back at what it always was, a
top WRESTLING show... plus you have very good entertaining... Edge is
the greatest heel of all times, MVP funny and charismatic as usual,
Jeff Hardy a human highlight reel... Undertaker is the deadman and
nobody can stop him, Mr.Kennedy is really entertaining and cut decent
promos, Festus & Jesse are really over and talented, the champ Triple H
is something... Well you have all you want in this show plus cute
chicks like Michelle McCool, Victoria & Maria to make this show, really
complete!
12 out of 18 people found the following comment useful :- A good Friday night entertainer, 1 January 2006
Author:
Ervin Järvlepp (ervin.jarvlepp@gmail.com) from Tallinn, Estonia
Friday Night Smackdown - it's a wrestling TV-show that is shown every
week on TV. It is not some kind of boring field of sport where
everything is made up. It's the other way round - wrestlers have
incredible matches and there are huge rivalries between them. You can
see unbelievable fights, wrestlers being sued, famous people visiting
the show and much more. When even Mike Tyson, Arnold Scwarznegger and
Ben Stiffler have visited it, why shouldn't You like it. The number of
different match types is huge, that makes the show last for ever, e.g.
"You can't see me" match (1 wrestler is blindfolded, the other one is
not), "Chairs and Tables" (these are used as weapons), different types
of cage matches, "Ambulance match", "Buried Alive Match", and many
matches with women, e.g. "Bra & Panties Match", "Evening Gown Match",
and much more. When you see it, you can't quit it.
4 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :- Great! I Love It!, 28 December 2005
Author:
the_kiss_army_45 from Canada
This is a great wrestling show! Great Talent and everything. I don't
know if it is as great as Monday Night Raw but it is Second if not tied
at first. Like Raw it has lots of great new guys and lots of great old
ones. They have new guys such as Randy Orton, Batista , MNM and Older
guys such as Bob Orton and Animal. I tune in when I can to watch
Smackdown! but sometimes I work on Thursday's. I asked my work to try
not to book me Monday nights for obvious reasons. But I recommend this
show to any wrestling fan who is in for a good watch of some great
professional wrestling.
10/10
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- You smell..... what the Rock is cookin'?!, 13 June 2000
Author:
coverme6 from Allentown, PA
The World Wrestling Federation has never been this popular or
this action-packed. With younger guys, wrestling became faster
and a hell of a lot tougher. The most popular wrestlers of this
generation, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, The Rock, and Triple H,
are definitely boosting up the TV ratings with their bad
attitudes and bone crushing moves. A guaranteed winner for the
Nielson ratings, "WWF Smackdown" can literally jolt some
adrenaline
9 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :- Why don't you protesters just get over it!, 20 July 2003
Author:
Keith (TRUSTcompany1990) from New York
I get very very very disturbed when people critisize wrestling because
it's
fake. I get it from everyone. First of all it is somewhat fake but not all
of it. Yes the punches are fake and attacks. But when you suplex someone,
let me just say that ring is not a trampoline. There is wood under that
ring. Yeah, sure they put a microphone under the mat to make more noise,
it
is cooler to make more noise. AND THEY DONT ALL WEAR SPEEDOS! Most people
never even watched it and say it sucks. If you don't like it, then don't
watch it. GET OVER IT! There is kids in the world that think it's fake.
Don't spoil it for them. Let them have fun. It is like Santa Clause or
Easter Bunny. And most of all, don't critisize wrestling fans. If people
are
talking about it, don't jump in and yell at them and protest.
3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Started to become dull, 21 September 2007
Author:
sashank_kini-1 from India
As a child, I used to love WWE. Especially Smackdown. But as I have
become a teen, I feel that it is losing its charm.
1) Horrible storyline: The G.M's marriage, the dead man risen from the
DEAD, the three to four feet dwarf becoming a champion, all these make
WWE a waste of time to watch.
2) Khali wrestlers like a pumpkin. He's so boring to watch and his so
called ' monster' title is so stupid. Umaga is so much better.
3) Same matches are seen every time I turn on to this show. THe main
even would surely include one or two of them: 1) Batista 2) Finley 3)
Khali. I mean, get new wrestlers with superb talent.
4) Finley with his Shirlene or something like that is so bugging.
The only thing good about this show that it is a complete time pass. 5
out of 10.
4 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- The better of the two brands., 2 February 2004
Author:
Gary Ballance from Dublin, Ireland
Ever since the brand extension in April 2002 it's been fairly obvious that
Smackdown is the stronger show. And while WWE seek to flush all of the SD!
talent to help boost the floundering Raw show, SD continues to provide
better wrestling on a week-to-week basis.
That said, Smackdown is not without its own flaws. I'll go into those in a
moment.
But, first the good elements of the show.
1) a fresh and entertaining commentary team. Tazz and Michael Cole are no
J.R. and The King- and they're much better for it! While Raw's announce
team
had to hop into the ring in September 2003 to make a change, Cole & Tazz
don't need that kind of gimmicky crap. They focus on the action (not harp
on
about puppies or put Triple H over) and have respect for the wrestlers in
the ring. [One of the things I hate about Heat is the fact that Marc Lloyd
and Jonathan Coachman just cannot call a match, instead waffling on about
what's happened on Raw. It's a lack of respect for the wrestlers- no
wonder
Heat is regarded as a relegation!] Tazz is one of the best colour analysts
I've heard (and adds some comedic value- particularly crooning along to
The
Cat's theme tune 'Somebody Call My Mama'!) and Michael Cole has really
come
on as a commentator in his own right. A good commentary team is essential
for a wrestling show and Smackdown are lucky to have such a good
team.
2) A great roster of superstars. While Smackdown has lost a lot of its
stars
from the original draft pick (Jericho, Matt Hardy, Randy Orton, etc) it
still has a great array of superstars- Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, Rey
Mysterio, Eddy Guerrero, John Cena, Shelton Benjamin, Charlie Haas and
even
The Undertaker has his moments! The roster- particularly the use made of
it
is also one of my pet peeves about the show.
3) Better solo-PPVs than the Raw show. Compare Bad Blood and Unforgiven to
Vengeance and No Mercy and it's obvious that Smackdown can put together a
superior PPV.
4) PPV-like matches often on the show. While Raw are happy to churn out
lacklustre matches w/ Mark Henry every week, Smackdown! has, on numerous
occasions, held PPV-quality matches. Examples: TLC 3, the Edge-Guerrero
ladder match, the 60 min Lesnar-Angle Ironman match, a Royal Rumble, 2
battle royals and one of the matches of 2003- Undertaker vs Kurt Angle in
a
one-on-one match for #1 contendership. Even recently, the Rey
Mysterio-Jamie
Noble match on Smackdown was BETTER than their match at the Royal Rumble.
Smackdown provides frequently.
and finally 5) Smackdown is, for the most part, a younger show giving time
to non-established stars. (At least it was originally.) Cena, Orton, Edge,
Mysterio, Lesnar all flourished on Smackdown. Compared to Raw, which has a
decrepid Ric Flair, a worn-out and downright poor Triple H, Kane and Mark
Henry, Smackdown has a fresher feel to it.
As I said though, Smackdown is not without its faults. There are a
few:
1) McMahon overload. 2003 was quite simply pure and utter hell for me.
Action speaks louder than words, but Smackdown was barely audible last
year
w/ Vince and Stephanie hogging the limelight. Every week would start w/
Vince and another promo. It was a joke. Stephanie was a joke as a GM and
Paul Heyman is doing an absolutely fantastic job as the current GM at the
moment. Vince and Stephanie even booked themselves into matches on the
SD-only PPVs- Steph vs Sable, Vince vs Zach Gowen, Vince vs Steph- it was
abominable. Vince and Stephanie were ruining their own show for the most
part of 2003 and I hope such an occurrence never happens again. I don't
take
kindly to promo time taking away from match time or non-wrestlers getting
matches where other actual wrestlers suffer on Velocity or dark matches.
Hopefully SD will continue along the road it's on now without the McMahons
interfering.
2) Stupid storylines. Mr.America. Dawn Marie and Al Wilson. The
Undertaker's
"affair". I'm saying no more except these were embarassing and
unnecessary.
3) Misuse of the roster. In particular here, I mean misuse of the entire
Cruiserweight division- since when has the division been 3 guys (Mysterio,
Tajiri and Noble)? Shannon Moore, Paul London & Billy Kidman are fantastic
talents yet WWE lets them sit on the shelf and passes at the opportunity
to
expand the division. It's ridiculous. And the loss of Brian 'Spanky'
Kendrick was in my opinion a huge blow. Tons of charisma and a brilliant
wrestler. They didn't know what they had. It looks like Ultimo Dragon will
go the same way- what an embarassment for this well-renowned
Cruiserweight.
Benoit and Guerrero were also criminally misused in 2003- the former
wrestling A-Train or the F.B.I frequently, the latter in a feud with the
Big
Show! Things are looking up for these two though, thankfully.
4)Misuse of the roster II. Ignoring the Cruiserweights and pushing
overweight slobs or "legends" (read: geriatrics who can't string a move
set
together.) How A-Train, Nathan Jones, Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper, Big Show,
Matt Morgan, Rikishi, Chuck Palumbo and Bradshaw got unlimited TV time in
2003 while the above superstars (Cruiserweights) got relegated to Velocity
shocks me. Hogan and Piper put on the worst match of the year at Judgment
Day and Hogan is an overrated embarassment who can't wrestle worth a damn.
His Mr America feud w/ Vince was pathetic.
The problem is- if WWE decide they need to cut the roster, no prizes for
guessing from which list they'll choose from.
5) Main events limited. Angle and Lesnar has been overdone a bit. They
need
to put a few new faces up for title contendership- NOT Undertaker. Good to
see Eddy Guerrero get a shot and I hope it's the start of things to
come.
Weighing up the pros and cons SD is a much more watchable show than Raw.
While its use of its star power is highly questionable, at least the
action
is generally very good.
Could be better though. I'm begging for an expanded Cruiserweight
division.
Hopefully 2004 will be a good year for it.
Unless a drastic loss of superstars to Raw occurs, I don't think SD should
worry- it has a better GM, better commentary team and all-round better
matches. I don't see this changing anytime soon.
4 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- An excellent show., 11 December 2002
Author:
Ashley Whitear from Southampton, England
WWE has done it again. First it was WWE Raw now it is WWE Smackdown! This
show shows again all types of shows from fatal 4 way matches to
streetfights. I am a wrestling fan myself and watch this show from
england.
My favourite wrestler is Triple-H and he is still the best in the
game.
This is another great show from WWE! It is 2 hours of non stop
entertainment. This show was created in 1999 to compete with TBS' then
wrestling show WCW Thunder! WWE (Then known as WWF) quickly whooped WCW
in the ratings for Thursday Nights, forcing WCW to move their show to
Wednesdays. Ray Mysterio, King Booker, And The one 7'2 guy all rule.
This show has had wrestlers start out here and eventually get traded to
Raw. Stars that have gone through this include: John Cena, Randy Orton,
and Torrie Wilson to name a few. This is one show I was almost always
look forward to watching every Friday Night. Hopefully This show, along
with Monday Night Raw will be around for years to come. So if you want
a good show to watch on Fridays, ya'll better watch this.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsepisode listepisodes castepisode ratings... by rating... by votestv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsrecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
"WWF Smackdown!" (1999)
20 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :-
Wrestling may be fake..., 5 January 2003
Author: Krakker_Jakk
I haven't watch wrestling for years. I've grown out of it, but even today when I hear others say, "Why do you watch wrestling? It's fake!" to others, it still urks me. Being fake is no reason not to watch it. YES IT IS FAKE! But so are sitcoms, soup operas, and just about every other TV (with the exception of those "reality tv" shows, but even some of them are actually fake). Only watch it to enjoy it. Don't let the fact that its fake sway the way you feel about it. It's like not listening to a certain singer because they are gay and letting that be the determining factor, even though they make good music. So who cares if its fake? If a kid wants to believe its real, then just let them. Why spoil the fun for someone?
13 out of 19 people found the following comment useful :-

Underrated, this is the ''A'' show with wrestlers that can actually WRESTLE & ENTERTAIN!!!, 29 April 2005
Author: CinemaLov (gilnor83@hotmail.com) from Québec, Canada
Unlike Monday nights, Smackdown brings the wrestling in their program. In the past, they got all the greatest wrestlers, legends, stars of tomorrow such as Randy Orton, Batista, Rey Mysterio, Lashley, Kid Kash, Mexicools, Paul London, Matt Hardy, Hardcore Holly, JBL, Booker T., Chris Benoit, and sometimes The Undertaker PLUS the future of this sport in The Boogeyman (strange dude), Stacy Keibler, Orlando Jordan, MNM, Sylvan... but even now, the roster is brilliant !
I can't get enough of 2 hours, 2 hours is not enough for such a good show. I am a wrestling fan and it's the reason why I love so much Smackdown and dislike RAW since 2002 because all the entertaining, wrestling and interesting story lines are.
Smackdown is the total package, sometimes it have his ups & downs but right now since Wrestlemania, the show is back at what it always was, a top WRESTLING show... plus you have very good entertaining... Edge is the greatest heel of all times, MVP funny and charismatic as usual, Jeff Hardy a human highlight reel... Undertaker is the deadman and nobody can stop him, Mr.Kennedy is really entertaining and cut decent promos, Festus & Jesse are really over and talented, the champ Triple H is something... Well you have all you want in this show plus cute chicks like Michelle McCool, Victoria & Maria to make this show, really complete!
12 out of 18 people found the following comment useful :-
A good Friday night entertainer, 1 January 2006
Author: Ervin Järvlepp (ervin.jarvlepp@gmail.com) from Tallinn, Estonia
Friday Night Smackdown - it's a wrestling TV-show that is shown every week on TV. It is not some kind of boring field of sport where everything is made up. It's the other way round - wrestlers have incredible matches and there are huge rivalries between them. You can see unbelievable fights, wrestlers being sued, famous people visiting the show and much more. When even Mike Tyson, Arnold Scwarznegger and Ben Stiffler have visited it, why shouldn't You like it. The number of different match types is huge, that makes the show last for ever, e.g. "You can't see me" match (1 wrestler is blindfolded, the other one is not), "Chairs and Tables" (these are used as weapons), different types of cage matches, "Ambulance match", "Buried Alive Match", and many matches with women, e.g. "Bra & Panties Match", "Evening Gown Match", and much more. When you see it, you can't quit it.
4 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-
Great! I Love It!, 28 December 2005
Author: the_kiss_army_45 from Canada
This is a great wrestling show! Great Talent and everything. I don't know if it is as great as Monday Night Raw but it is Second if not tied at first. Like Raw it has lots of great new guys and lots of great old ones. They have new guys such as Randy Orton, Batista , MNM and Older guys such as Bob Orton and Animal. I tune in when I can to watch Smackdown! but sometimes I work on Thursday's. I asked my work to try not to book me Monday nights for obvious reasons. But I recommend this show to any wrestling fan who is in for a good watch of some great professional wrestling.
10/10
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
You smell..... what the Rock is cookin'?!, 13 June 2000
Author: coverme6 from Allentown, PA
The World Wrestling Federation has never been this popular or this action-packed. With younger guys, wrestling became faster and a hell of a lot tougher. The most popular wrestlers of this generation, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, The Rock, and Triple H, are definitely boosting up the TV ratings with their bad attitudes and bone crushing moves. A guaranteed winner for the Nielson ratings, "WWF Smackdown" can literally jolt some adrenaline
9 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :-
Why don't you protesters just get over it!, 20 July 2003
Author: Keith (TRUSTcompany1990) from New York
I get very very very disturbed when people critisize wrestling because it's fake. I get it from everyone. First of all it is somewhat fake but not all of it. Yes the punches are fake and attacks. But when you suplex someone, let me just say that ring is not a trampoline. There is wood under that ring. Yeah, sure they put a microphone under the mat to make more noise, it is cooler to make more noise. AND THEY DONT ALL WEAR SPEEDOS! Most people never even watched it and say it sucks. If you don't like it, then don't watch it. GET OVER IT! There is kids in the world that think it's fake. Don't spoil it for them. Let them have fun. It is like Santa Clause or Easter Bunny. And most of all, don't critisize wrestling fans. If people are talking about it, don't jump in and yell at them and protest.
3 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Started to become dull, 21 September 2007
Author: sashank_kini-1 from India
As a child, I used to love WWE. Especially Smackdown. But as I have become a teen, I feel that it is losing its charm.
1) Horrible storyline: The G.M's marriage, the dead man risen from the DEAD, the three to four feet dwarf becoming a champion, all these make WWE a waste of time to watch.
2) Khali wrestlers like a pumpkin. He's so boring to watch and his so called ' monster' title is so stupid. Umaga is so much better.
3) Same matches are seen every time I turn on to this show. THe main even would surely include one or two of them: 1) Batista 2) Finley 3) Khali. I mean, get new wrestlers with superb talent.
4) Finley with his Shirlene or something like that is so bugging.
The only thing good about this show that it is a complete time pass. 5 out of 10.
4 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
The better of the two brands., 2 February 2004
Author: Gary Ballance from Dublin, Ireland
Ever since the brand extension in April 2002 it's been fairly obvious that Smackdown is the stronger show. And while WWE seek to flush all of the SD! talent to help boost the floundering Raw show, SD continues to provide better wrestling on a week-to-week basis.
That said, Smackdown is not without its own flaws. I'll go into those in a moment.
But, first the good elements of the show.
1) a fresh and entertaining commentary team. Tazz and Michael Cole are no J.R. and The King- and they're much better for it! While Raw's announce team had to hop into the ring in September 2003 to make a change, Cole & Tazz don't need that kind of gimmicky crap. They focus on the action (not harp on about puppies or put Triple H over) and have respect for the wrestlers in the ring. [One of the things I hate about Heat is the fact that Marc Lloyd and Jonathan Coachman just cannot call a match, instead waffling on about what's happened on Raw. It's a lack of respect for the wrestlers- no wonder Heat is regarded as a relegation!] Tazz is one of the best colour analysts I've heard (and adds some comedic value- particularly crooning along to The Cat's theme tune 'Somebody Call My Mama'!) and Michael Cole has really come on as a commentator in his own right. A good commentary team is essential for a wrestling show and Smackdown are lucky to have such a good team.
2) A great roster of superstars. While Smackdown has lost a lot of its stars from the original draft pick (Jericho, Matt Hardy, Randy Orton, etc) it still has a great array of superstars- Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, Rey Mysterio, Eddy Guerrero, John Cena, Shelton Benjamin, Charlie Haas and even The Undertaker has his moments! The roster- particularly the use made of it is also one of my pet peeves about the show.
3) Better solo-PPVs than the Raw show. Compare Bad Blood and Unforgiven to Vengeance and No Mercy and it's obvious that Smackdown can put together a superior PPV.
4) PPV-like matches often on the show. While Raw are happy to churn out lacklustre matches w/ Mark Henry every week, Smackdown! has, on numerous occasions, held PPV-quality matches. Examples: TLC 3, the Edge-Guerrero ladder match, the 60 min Lesnar-Angle Ironman match, a Royal Rumble, 2 battle royals and one of the matches of 2003- Undertaker vs Kurt Angle in a one-on-one match for #1 contendership. Even recently, the Rey Mysterio-Jamie Noble match on Smackdown was BETTER than their match at the Royal Rumble. Smackdown provides frequently.
and finally 5) Smackdown is, for the most part, a younger show giving time to non-established stars. (At least it was originally.) Cena, Orton, Edge, Mysterio, Lesnar all flourished on Smackdown. Compared to Raw, which has a decrepid Ric Flair, a worn-out and downright poor Triple H, Kane and Mark Henry, Smackdown has a fresher feel to it.
As I said though, Smackdown is not without its faults. There are a few:
1) McMahon overload. 2003 was quite simply pure and utter hell for me. Action speaks louder than words, but Smackdown was barely audible last year w/ Vince and Stephanie hogging the limelight. Every week would start w/ Vince and another promo. It was a joke. Stephanie was a joke as a GM and Paul Heyman is doing an absolutely fantastic job as the current GM at the moment. Vince and Stephanie even booked themselves into matches on the SD-only PPVs- Steph vs Sable, Vince vs Zach Gowen, Vince vs Steph- it was abominable. Vince and Stephanie were ruining their own show for the most part of 2003 and I hope such an occurrence never happens again. I don't take kindly to promo time taking away from match time or non-wrestlers getting matches where other actual wrestlers suffer on Velocity or dark matches. Hopefully SD will continue along the road it's on now without the McMahons interfering.
2) Stupid storylines. Mr.America. Dawn Marie and Al Wilson. The Undertaker's "affair". I'm saying no more except these were embarassing and unnecessary.
3) Misuse of the roster. In particular here, I mean misuse of the entire Cruiserweight division- since when has the division been 3 guys (Mysterio, Tajiri and Noble)? Shannon Moore, Paul London & Billy Kidman are fantastic talents yet WWE lets them sit on the shelf and passes at the opportunity to expand the division. It's ridiculous. And the loss of Brian 'Spanky' Kendrick was in my opinion a huge blow. Tons of charisma and a brilliant wrestler. They didn't know what they had. It looks like Ultimo Dragon will go the same way- what an embarassment for this well-renowned Cruiserweight.
Benoit and Guerrero were also criminally misused in 2003- the former wrestling A-Train or the F.B.I frequently, the latter in a feud with the Big Show! Things are looking up for these two though, thankfully.
4)Misuse of the roster II. Ignoring the Cruiserweights and pushing overweight slobs or "legends" (read: geriatrics who can't string a move set together.) How A-Train, Nathan Jones, Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper, Big Show, Matt Morgan, Rikishi, Chuck Palumbo and Bradshaw got unlimited TV time in 2003 while the above superstars (Cruiserweights) got relegated to Velocity shocks me. Hogan and Piper put on the worst match of the year at Judgment Day and Hogan is an overrated embarassment who can't wrestle worth a damn. His Mr America feud w/ Vince was pathetic.
The problem is- if WWE decide they need to cut the roster, no prizes for guessing from which list they'll choose from.
5) Main events limited. Angle and Lesnar has been overdone a bit. They need to put a few new faces up for title contendership- NOT Undertaker. Good to see Eddy Guerrero get a shot and I hope it's the start of things to come.
Weighing up the pros and cons SD is a much more watchable show than Raw. While its use of its star power is highly questionable, at least the action is generally very good.
Could be better though. I'm begging for an expanded Cruiserweight division. Hopefully 2004 will be a good year for it.
Unless a drastic loss of superstars to Raw occurs, I don't think SD should worry- it has a better GM, better commentary team and all-round better matches. I don't see this changing anytime soon.
4 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
An excellent show., 11 December 2002
Author: Ashley Whitear from Southampton, England
WWE has done it again. First it was WWE Raw now it is WWE Smackdown! This show shows again all types of shows from fatal 4 way matches to streetfights. I am a wrestling fan myself and watch this show from england. My favourite wrestler is Triple-H and he is still the best in the game.
Another great show from WWE!, 18 August 2006

Author: Spikeman Howell (Lhowell02) from San Diego, Ca
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This is another great show from WWE! It is 2 hours of non stop entertainment. This show was created in 1999 to compete with TBS' then wrestling show WCW Thunder! WWE (Then known as WWF) quickly whooped WCW in the ratings for Thursday Nights, forcing WCW to move their show to Wednesdays. Ray Mysterio, King Booker, And The one 7'2 guy all rule. This show has had wrestlers start out here and eventually get traded to Raw. Stars that have gone through this include: John Cena, Randy Orton, and Torrie Wilson to name a few. This is one show I was almost always look forward to watching every Friday Night. Hopefully This show, along with Monday Night Raw will be around for years to come. So if you want a good show to watch on Fridays, ya'll better watch this.
Add another comment
Related Links