3 user 12 critic

Don't Expect Too Much (2011)

TV-MA | | Documentary | 3 October 2011 (USA)
Drawing on Nicholas Ray's archive of never-before-seen film, video, and stills, his wife Susan investigates the questions of his work and the relationship forged by Ray between his life and... See full summary »




Watch Now

From $3.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

The most complete, newly restored version of Nicholas Ray's experimental masterpiece embodies the director's practice of film-making as a "communal way of life." Ray plays himself in the ... See full summary »

Director: Nicholas Ray
Stars: Richard Bock, Tom Farrell, Danny Fisher
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

Director Nicholas Ray is eager to complete a final film before his imminent death from cancer. Wim Wenders is working on his own film Hammett (1982) in Hollywood, but flies to New York to ... See full summary »

Directors: Nicholas Ray, Wim Wenders
Stars: Gerry Bamman, Ronee Blakley, Pierre Cottrell
The Lusty Men (1952)
Action | Drama | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

Retired rodeo champion Jeff McCloud agrees to mentor novice rodeo contestant Wes Merritt against the wishes of Merritt's wife who fears the dangers of this rough sport.

Directors: Nicholas Ray, Robert Parrish
Stars: Susan Hayward, Robert Mitchum, Arthur Kennedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

A seriously ill schoolteacher becomes dependent on a "miracle" drug that begins to affect his sanity.

Director: Nicholas Ray
Stars: James Mason, Barbara Rush, Walter Matthau
Crime | Drama | Film-Noir
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Andrew Morton is an attorney who made it out of the slums. Nick Romano is his client, a young man with a long string of crimes behind him. After he lost his paycheck gambling, hoping to buy... See full summary »

Director: Nicholas Ray
Stars: Humphrey Bogart, John Derek, George Macready


Credited cast:
Richard Bock ...
Peer Bode ...
Charles Bornstein ...
Bernard Eisenschitz ...
Danny Fisher ...
Mark Goldstein ...
Jane Heymann ...
Leslie Levinson ...
Myron Meisel ...
Himself (archive footage)


Drawing on Nicholas Ray's archive of never-before-seen film, video, and stills, his wife Susan investigates the questions of his work and the relationship forged by Ray between his life and his art. Includes interviews with Jim Jarmusch and Victor Erice. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

f rated | See All (1) »








Release Date:

3 October 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Ne očekujte previše  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Did You Know?


References We Can't Go Home Again (1973) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

just because amateurs do something doesn't make it interesting...
28 October 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

So, let me say, up front, that I have not seen "we can't go home again", the film that this is the making of...of(?). And I am certain that I would jump at the chance to make a film with Nicholas Ray, which apparently is the subject of this film. The problem... no one involved in this film seems to know the first thing about making a film. while the intention is noble, and the idea is promising, i was astonished at the anecdotes. not because they were too odd or offensive or whatnot. instead they provided information that was of literally no value. for example, they seemed to be impressed by the fact that, as a class and a crew of the film, they all "pitched in and did whatever job needed to be done". Indeed, they make that point a number of times (i want to say more than ten). Now, I went to film school. I was in several classes no doubt extremely similar in composition and concept as the ones at SUNY Binghampton taught by Mr. Ray. I also crewed on several student films, and indeed have served as freelance crew on several independent features as well. On every one of those films, in ever single one of those situations, it would have been an act of exceptional rudeness to NOT help out in whatever way you were needed. Now, i know that the perception is on big Hollywood movies, that no one touches a piece of gear for fear of being reprimanded by the unions. I've never worked on a big budget movie, so it may be that way, but I can say that in every other situation I've encountered, it would be really rude and almost confrontational not to help out in whatever way possible.

another guy talks about the hardships encountered during the shot. He reported that they had to go to the trouble of setting up all the lights BEFORE they started filming! (gasp!) and that the camera would, on occasion, simply... RUN OUT of film during a take.

okay, let me qualify this by saying sure, you may be shooting a documentary or something where lighting set ups are either non existent or minimal. And yes, when shooting on video, esp on hd cards with a lot of memory, the idea of a finite run time on film reels might seems a bit antiquated. But in a situation where you are shooting a standard type of film with typical film lighting, and using your standard film camera, the above "hardships" occurred ON EVEY SINGLE FILM EVER MADE!!!!! in fact, the ENTIRE IDEA of using lights is to set them up so they create a desired effect. There is not just one, but indeed several members of the crew whose job is just ti set and juice lights. as for running out of film... yeah... depending on the size of the reel, it was about every 11 minutes. I'm not sure what this guy thought the process was like, but i guess he thought that movies were just, you know, shot all at once. 2 hour movie? Easy. 2 hour shot. we're all home by 5.

and even worse... these people don't seem to have anything interesting to say, even if its about themselves... a lot of "it was the 60s, and i was embarking on a search to find out exactly... who was this guy i saw in the mirror. so you've got pretentious people telling a story about which they seem to have zero understanding. It would be as if a WWII submarine battle were brought to the screen by a kindergarten class. It's probably a great story. Thy may even be excited by it, but they won't really be able to explain why its great, and though you may admire their pluckish verve and amateur spirit, its still not going to make a lick of sense. thats "don't expect too much". since this really is almost literally an amateur film, its probably unfair to be too harsh on it. The film the class made with Mr. Ray is described as experimental, and it would be fair to apply that label to this film as well. It is probably most accurate to imagine this as a class project, turned in for the grade, whereas Ray's feature is "extra credit". I'm sure they were nice people, and I'm sure it was a great experience. I hope they all got an "A", but unless you are scoring their tests, you should probably skip this.

1 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page