4.5/10
34,262
208 user 204 critic

Rings (2017)

PG-13 | | Drama, Horror, Mystery | 3 February 2017 (USA)
Trailer
1:02 | Trailer

Watch Now

With Prime Video

ALL
A young woman finds herself on the receiving end of a terrifying curse that threatens to take her life in 7 days.

Writers:

David Loucka (screenplay by), Jacob Estes (screenplay by) | 4 more credits »
Reviews
Popularity
3,068 ( 633)
2 wins. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz ... Julia (as Matilda Lutz)
Alex Roe ... Holt
Johnny Galecki ... Gabriel
Vincent D'Onofrio ... Burke
Aimee Teegarden ... Skye
Bonnie Morgan ... Samara
Chuck David Willis ... Blue (as Chuck Willis)
Patrick R. Walker ... Jamal (as Patrick Walker)
Zach Roerig ... Carter
Laura Wiggins ... Faith (as Laura Slade Wiggins)
Lizzie Brocheré ... Kelly (as Lizzie Brochere)
Karen Ceesay ... Flight Attendant
Dave Blamy ... First Officer
Michael E. Sanders ... Pilot
Randall Taylor ... Holt's Father
Edit

Storyline

Julia becomes worried about her boyfriend, Holt, when he explores the dark urban legend of a mysterious video said to kill the watcher seven days after viewing. She sacrifices herself to save her boyfriend and in doing so makes a horrifying discovery: there is a "movie within the movie" that no one has ever seen before. Written by ahmetkozan

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

sequel | vcr | curse | blind man | church | See All (71) »

Taglines:

Evil is reborn See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for violence/terror, thematic elements, some sexuality and brief drug material | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Official Facebook | Official site | See more »

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

3 February 2017 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

The Ring 3 See more »

Edit

Box Office

Budget:

$25,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA:

$13,002,632, 5 February 2017, Wide Release

Gross USA:

$27,780,085, 21 March 2017

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$83,018,523, 2 April 2017
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

In the over one year delay in this film's theatrical release since October 2015, nearly 20 minutes of footage was altered and deleted which significantly altered some plot elements. Some of these deleted scenes can still be seen in the film's handful of trailers. Most of this footage was included as deleted scenes on the Blu-ray and DVD save for a few like the ring scar on Julia's back, which was also a promotional poster for the film. See more »

Goofs

Julia is wearing a ring when Gabriel scans her hand but it doesn't show up in the scanned picture of her hand. See more »

Quotes

Sky: 7:10. I win, bitch.
See more »

Crazy Credits

At the beginning of the movie, the stars in the Paramount logo flicker, the background darkens and for a brief moment, the stars change into the sign of The Ring. See more »

Alternate Versions

The digital HD and Blu-ray releases include behind-the-scenes interviews with the cast & crew, deleted/extended scenes, and an alternative ending. See more »

Connections

References Alien (1979) See more »

Soundtracks

The Wolf
[from Red Riding Hood (2011))
Written by Karin Dreijer (as Karin Elizabeth Deijer Andersson), Christoffer Berg, Graciela Lourdes Zavala Lilianna, Peder Maans Mannerfelt & Van Rivers
Performed by Fever Ray
Courtesy of Mute
By Arrangement with Bank Robber Music
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more »

User Reviews

 
It would be best to toss these Rings
11 June 2017 | by rparhamSee all my reviews

Horror sequels are a tricky thing. By their very nature, horror films are supposed to shock and surprise, yet a sequel's nature often is to give you more of what was provided by the first round. The outcome is that usually a horror sequel is at best a watered down rehash of what came before, and at worst a disaster that makes the original film feel worse than it was when you watched it the first time. Rings isn't quite the latter, but at times it comes close.

At the opening of Rings we are treated to a sequence in which an individual who had viewed the infamous video of antagonist Samara is traveling by airplane and believing being in a public space will keep him safe from harm since his 7 days are up. Oh, so wrong, for him and his fellow passengers. Next, the film introduces the leads, Julia (Matilda Lutz) and boyfriend Holt (Alex Roe) as he is headed off to college in a distant city. At first they keep in touch by Skype, but Holt first acts weird and then is unresponsive to Julia's attempts to reach him. Concerned, she drives to his school and via some sleuthing, discovers that Holt has fallen under the sway of a professor (Johnny Galecki, who just can't seem to break away from an academic setting) who has created a cult of sorts around the Samara video and is trying to research it to accomplish . . . something (there is some dialogue alluding to the professor's goals, but frankly it's all just rubbish).

When Holt, who has seen the video, is fast approaching his seven day deadline, Julia takes the hit of watching the video, starting a new cycle. But this time something odd has happened when copying the video and visions that Julia keeps seeing leads her and Holt to a small city where Samara once lived believing this will help find the key to Julia's salvation.

Despite a moment or two of off kilter imagery, Rings is not the least bit scary. Perhaps some of the reason for that is because the proverbial cat has been let out of the bag regarding the story's key "hook" (watch disturbing video, seven days later you meet a gruesome demise) and that all the original film's power to scare is gone and we are left with lukewarm leftovers. But the simple fact is, director F. Javier Gutierrez and screenwriters David Loucka, Jacob Estes and Akiva Goldsman just don't seem to be trying. Rings feels less like an out and out horror film and more like an occasionally creepy mystery drama, and isn't helped by the fact that the mystery aspects of the film aren't engaging. At least one "twist" is so obviously telegraphed that you wonder if any audience member would be surprised by it, which represents about all this tepid film can produce.

The acting is generally middle of the road. Lutz and Roe fill the typical slots of fresh meat for the grinder, not generating much interest of likability. The screenplay wants us to root for them, but it's a forced affection. Johnny Galecki is briefly vacating his Big Bang Theory sitcom cocoon, and his character has a bit of intrigue to him, but there isn't that much for him to work with. Vincent D'Onofrio makes a late film appearance as a local priest, and while he always brings something to pretty much any role he takes, there is nothing particularly remarkable here to make him stand out aside from being one of the few recognizable names in the cast.

Rings exists because, as has been common in filmmaking in recent years, this is a recognizable and familiar franchise that Paramount owns the rights to and can churn out another entry on the cheap and hopefully make a few bucks on. It is a rather depressing state of affairs that that is all that is necessary to warrant a film from a major Hollywood studio be produced these days, and that might be the most horrifying thing about Rings.


5 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 208 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending Movies With Prime Video

Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial



Recently Viewed