27 user 5 critic

Deadliest Warrior 

2:37 | Clip
The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.




3   2   1   Unknown  
2011   2010   2009   Unknown  



Learn more

More Like This 

1000 Ways to Die (2008–2012)
Documentary | Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Several different deaths based on true stories.

Stars: Alisdair Simpson, Ron Perlman, Khyber Zaffarkhan
Action | Adventure | Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.7/10 X  

A silly Japanese game show on which contestants are painfully eliminated through barely possible stunts and events, most taking place above pools of mud.

Stars: Victor Wilson, Christopher Darga, John Cervenka
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

Ripley's Believe It or Not! is a curious format, sort of a 'Guiness Book of Records'-like magazine on TV. It has no permanent cast or storyline, just a presenting host in the castle-type LA... See full summary »

Stars: Dean Cain, Kelly Packard, Daniel Browning Smith
Takeshi's Castle (1986–1989)
Action | Comedy | Game-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  

A game show where upwards of 100 contestants (give or take) try to get through various wet, dirty, and wild obstacles and games for a chance to win the grand prize of 1 million yen (Approx. $10,000) by defeating Takeshi and his crew.

Stars: Takeshi Kitano, Michiru Jo, Hayato Tani
MANswers (TV Series 2007)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

Various stupid (and some very interesting) questions are answered by men.

Stars: Bobbi Billard, Matt Short, Ward Roberts
Criss Angel Mindfreak (2005–2010)
Fantasy | Reality-TV
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

Criss Angel shows us a new way of magic. He shows that doing magic, is not only making some good tricks on TV. He's kicking ass! Watch this mind master doing his magic all around the world.... See full summary »

Stars: Criss Angel, Andrew Gerard Henderson, Banachek
Fear Factor I (2001–2012)
Game-Show | Reality-TV | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.6/10 X  

Doing scary stuff to win prizes.

Stars: Joe Rogan, Meghan Allen, Meg Daleske
Jackass (2000–2007)
Action | Comedy | Reality-TV
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

The cast performs various crazy stunts for our amusement.

Stars: Johnny Knoxville, Chris Pontius, Dave England
Jeopardy! (TV Series 1984)
Short | Game-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.2/10 X  

A returning champion and two challengers test their buzzer skills and their knowledge in a wide range of academic and popular categories.

Stars: Alex Trebek, Johnny Gilbert, Jimmy McGuire
Hoarders (TV Series 2009)
Documentary | Reality-TV
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Follows different people on their hoarding issues.

Stars: Matt Paxton, Robin Zasio, Dorothy Breininger
NBC Sunday Night Football (TV Series 2006)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Professional football games played on Sunday night.

Stars: Al Michaels, Cris Collinsworth, Ben Roethlisberger


Series cast summary:
Geoff Desmoulin Geoff Desmoulin ...  Himself - Host / ... 33 episodes, 2009-2011
Armand Dorian Armand Dorian ...  Himself / ... 29 episodes, 2009-2011
Max Geiger Max Geiger ...  Himself - Computer Programmer / ... 23 episodes, 2009-2010


Throughout history, there have been great warriors who have made their mark in battle, but how they could have matched up against each other is a mystery. This series endeavors to solve that mystery with various matchups of such warrior classes. With a systematic examination of their physical and cultural qualities, training and weapons, a field of experts strive to find the real facts of such warriors. When the research is compete, each episode ends with a simulated battle to see who is truly the deadliest warrior. Written by Kenneth Chisholm (kchishol@rogers.com)

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Who is Deadliest? See more »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »






Release Date:

10 March 2009 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

El guerrero más letal See more »

Filming Locations:

Los Angeles, California, USA

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs



Sound Mix:

Dolby SR



Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See full technical specs »

Did You Know?


This show first aired April 2009. It quickly became the number one show on Spike. See more »


[repeated line]
Narrator: Who will be the deadliest warrior?
See more »


Referenced in Chivalry: Deadliest Warrior (2013) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Action heavy, logic lapsed
20 May 2009 | by dorotka24See all my reviews

I must first say about this series that the premise is outstanding, and one that has crossed my mind on numerous occasions. What would happen if a medieval knight met up with a samurai? Who would be victorious in battle?

The show then attempts to determine whom is the better warrior amongst two different kinds in history - in many cases two warriors that are separated by many centuries. The arms and armors available to these warriors are demonstrated, both in their lethal potential or in their stopping power in the case of armor. The demonstrations are fascinating, including weapons experts that strike or fire their weapons at ballistics gel encased, and presumably reproduction skeletons. A physician or medical specialist then examines the footage, or the dummy in some cases, and describes the type of trauma inflicted. At the end, we get a well choreographed fight between two re-enactors dressed in costume to simulate the potential outcome of such a contest, as well as a statistics model that determines the winner in 1,000 contests. I like this concept because despite the advantages a particular warrior might possess over another, the randomness of combat will ensure that even the presumably better warrior will lose at least a percentage of the time.

The problems with the show are many, however, and seriously challenge the credibility of the participants. As others have pointed out, a warrior is more than the sum of his weapons and armor, which the show spends the most amount of time demonstrating. I think the premise could be dropped and have the show focus on weapons demonstrations only. Although the mindset, culture, tactics, and goals of each warrior are mentioned, these descriptions are brief and superficial. In addition,the hypothetical combats displayed are all duels. Most of the warriors portrayed would rarely, if ever, be faced with a duel situation, instead fighting in a unit of many soldiers/warriors. The worst part for me has to be the banter or trash talk between the weapons experts representing each respective warrior. It reminds me of a WWE matchup or a pre-boxing/MMA trash session instead of a presumably serious and/or scientific look at a hypothetical combat situation.

At any rate, I do enjoy the show because it has many good aspects. But the flaws do not make for "must-see" TV. If they would focus a little more on the tactics, drop the banter, and perhaps consider tactical unit combat instead of duels, I believe the show would be much improved. The producers are obviously trying to cater to a younger, action thirsty crowd, perhaps in an effort to make history more interesting. I applaud this rationale if nothing else, but the more discriminating viewers with a desire for logical and factual history, such as myself, are often left wanting.

If any wish for a superior show with similarities to DW, check out an earlier History Channel series called "Conquest" with Peter Woodward. The latter is more mature, yet still with some light hearted moments. It covers nearly every criticism I have for DW and then some (see my review).

EDIT: I had not seen Season 3 prior to this original review, and S3 does cover some of my criticisms for the first two Seasons. The banter here has been toned down substantially and the combats all consist of units fighting each other. The warrior's mindsets, values, and motivations are explored with the addition of Richard Machowicz. I also liked the addition of the "X Factors" as well, or somewhat intangible characteristics such as mental health or physical fitness which could positively or negatively impact a side's performance. Overall the changes added a more serious and scientific component to the show that was a substantial improvement IMO.

There are still a few problems that I saw, particularly with the tendency to match two opponents who were not a very good matchup to begin with. Hannibal and Genghis Khan was a good example, as they were separated by nearly 1,400 years and Khan's armor and weapons technology was far superior. Same could be said of William the Conqueror and Joan of Arc. It was a little silly to see a unit of five men firing a heavy artillery piece at each other as well. The elite modern soldiers did not have weapons that they most likely would have carried. I am particularly thinking about the Rangers/North Korea and Gurkha/French Foreign Legion in that all these soldiers would have probably carried hand grenades and a pistol of some kind. Roosevelt/Lawrence of Arabia or even Washington/Napolean would have probably had pistols as well. Oddly enough, only Pancho Villa/Crazy Horse were depicted carrying pistols.

In general, the format changes in S3 were an improvement and I enjoyed it quite a bit more than the previous seasons.

41 of 51 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 27 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Free Movies and TV Shows You Can Watch Now

On IMDb TV, you can catch Hollywood hits and popular TV series at no cost. Select any poster below to play the movie, totally free!

Browse free movies and TV series

Stream Trending Movies With Prime Video

Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial

Recently Viewed