826 user 262 critic

A Wrinkle in Time (2018)

0:31 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Prime Video

After the disappearance of her scientist father, three peculiar beings send Meg, her brother, and her friend to space in order to find him.


Ava DuVernay


Jennifer Lee (screenplay by), Jeff Stockwell (screenplay by) | 1 more credit »
1,385 ( 238)
4 wins & 14 nominations. See more awards »





Cast overview, first billed only:
Storm Reid ... Meg
Oprah Winfrey ... Mrs. Which
Reese Witherspoon ... Mrs. Whatsit
Mindy Kaling ... Mrs. Who
Levi Miller ... Calvin
Deric McCabe ... Charles Wallace
Chris Pine ... Mr. Murry
Gugu Mbatha-Raw ... Mrs. Murry
Zach Galifianakis ... Happy Medium
Michael Peña ... Red
André Holland ... Principal Jenkins
Rowan Blanchard ... Veronica Kiley
Bellamy Young ... Camazotz Woman
David Oyelowo ... The It (voice)
Conrad Roberts ... Elegant Man


Following the discovery of a new form of space travel as well as Meg's father's disappearance, she, her brother, and her friend must join three magical beings - Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which - to travel across the universe to rescue him from a terrible evil.

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Be a warrior

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

rated PG for thematic elements and some peril | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »


Official Sites:

Official Site





Release Date:

9 March 2018 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

A Wrinkle in Time See more »

Filming Locations:

Los Angeles, California, USA See more »


Box Office


$100,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA:

$33,123,609, 11 March 2018, Wide Release

Gross USA:


Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

Dolby Atmos (Dolby Atmos+Vision)| Auro 11.1



Aspect Ratio:

2.39 : 1
See full technical specs »

Did You Know?


Over the entrance to Mrs. Who's (Mindy Kaling's) house is a street-number sign with the eight hanging lopsided, forming an infinity symbol. See more »


In several scenes, Meg's glasses do not have any lenses in them. See more »


Principal Jenkins: You're next, Charles Wallace!
[closes the door]
Principal Jenkins: Veronica Kiley's parents are on their way here. They're worried for their daughter's safety.
Meg: Their daughter is mean!
Principal Jenkins: You hit her in the face!
[sits at his desk and pauses]
Principal Jenkins: You - you we're a top student. Top attitude. But, look at you now. You - you're aggressive, you're hostile, you shut everybody out, and then wonder why they don't like you.
Meg: I don't wonder and I don't care!
Principal Jenkins: Hmm. Well, maybe that's your problem!
Meg: I don't have a problem!
See more »

Crazy Credits

The movie title does not appear until the end credits. See more »


Flower of the Universe
Written and Produced by Sade (as Sade Adu), Ben Travers, and Andrew Hale
Performed by Sade
Courtesy of Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Broken brain
4 June 2018 | by BiiivALSee all my reviews

Disney's studio has always been famous for the ability to find a common language with its target audience - with families, but recently something went wrong, because every new studio film (if it's not a new part of the next franchise) is a complete disappointment. Disney bosses in the pursuit of profit put not on those projects, and, as a result, failure after failure, so that the number of new films shot according to original scenarios or being screen versions of books, becomes less. I do not know what the goals were pursued by the notorious Disney bosses when they took on the adaptation of the little-known books by Madeleine L'Engle, but the new film on the first part of the cycle can not be called success.

For a long time already a fantastic and bright fantasy did not cause such wild boredom, as it happened with the "Breaking of Time". This is an openly weak film that demonstrates how much Disney's studio has passed its position in the field of family cinema. I do not know if the original source of the script is at fault, but the story turned out to be so confused and difficult to digest that it's difficult not only for children but also for adults to sit out until the end of the film. This is the case when a beautiful picture does not completely compensate for the lack of a sane script.

The first thing you want to scold the creators of the picture is that with what seriousness they carry pseudoscientific nonsense to the masses. Here we have the parents of the main heroine, dear physicists, who repeat some kind of heresy about love-charged particles on different ends of the universe that can be attracted to each other ... by the power of this love. I might have misunderstood something, but it sounded like that. And then we rub a simplified version of string theory, according to which the universe can travel without any spaceships and spacesuits, just as you click your fingers. And all this pseudo-scientific nonsense, of course, must be confirmed by the appearance of three eccentric ladies who are able to fold time and space at will. If everything happened because of the magic, it would be much less offensive than when we weave physics and try to cover up its laws by unsuccessful, it's worth emphasizing, all the krabli-crabs that occur on the screen. This also includes some kind of absolute evil, unraveling its tentacles throughout the universe. Evil is so incomprehensible that it seems that even the script writers could not comprehend it and outlined schematically that in the plot there was at least some antagonist.

The second weak component of the "Break of Time" - the characters. With the exception of the young Deris McCabe and the magnificent Reese Witherspoon, one can not even mention an actor's game. Chris Pine is trying to squeeze something out of himself, but his history is not enough, and there is nothing special to play. Storm Reid and Levi Miller, apparently, are still too inexperienced, so all the attention to themselves is drawn by more eminent stars.

And the "Time Fracture" is an example of reverse racial discrimination, when black actors are shoved literally into all the central roles, singling out only a few roles to "whites". Maybe it's a black director, or maybe it was the writer's vision, but there are too many black actors. Even if you quickly assess Meg Murry's surroundings at school, then virtually all of her offenders are "black" or Latino, the director is "black," she herself, her mother and brother are also, even two of the three cosmic entities - "colored". But the "white" can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And I would not say that it somehow touches me, but when the viewer is literally jabbed by the racial diversity, which is attracted to the ears, and political correctness - this causes only rejection and perplexity. A "Time Fracture" is not a "Black Panther", the "black" cast of which is conditioned by the plot. The third point that upset me was the everywhere hanging guns on the walls, which did not fire when they were supposed to shoot. The film asked a bunch of questions, the answers to which the viewer has not received, and is unlikely to receive. What discovery did Alexander Murri, that the universe so appreciates? How did he move? Why is Charles Wallace so clever and how does he know the three Mrs.? Why did Shadow become interested in the boy? How to understand the ending with obsession? There are so many questions after viewing that it seems as if you looked not a two-hour film, but separate episodes of the series, between which there should be more scenes that would explain everything. But they are not. And it would be very annoying if the film caused a little interest. But he is so sluggish and refined that you follow the final drama without much enthusiasm and without looking at the clock.

Of the pros, I can distinguish except that the work of costumers, an excellent visual series and beautiful landscapes of other planets. But in the century of ubiquitous computer graphics in the cinema, it is already difficult to surprise such people, but perhaps a qualitative scenario is possible. "Break of time", alas, it was not possible. Children to watch the twists and turns of the story will be boring, and adults have nothing to watch at all. Thus, the film is unlikely to find its target audience and will sink in oblivion after many other original Disney films of recent years.

160 of 209 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 826 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending Movies With Prime Video

Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial

Recently Viewed