Change Your Image
Upload An Image
Crop And Save
To search for images of people on titles in IMDb, use Google like this: gower champion imdb mediaviewer
ListsAn error has ocurred. Please try again
The links below are to my public blogspot, http://bdrdiary.blogspot.com/
Did you know that you can perform Advanced Title Search for lists NOT your own?
To view a single year (1946): https://www.imdb.com/list/ls020839949/?sort=release_date,asc&release_date=1946
Link for estimated #discs (1937): https://www.imdb.com/search/title?release_date=1937&lists=ls007035631,!ls058183489,!ls060663034,!ls066133047,!ls022193935&view=simple&sort=release_date,asc&count=100
Link for unrated non-music/als (1900+): https://www.imdb.com/search/title?release_date=1900,&my_ratings=exclude&lists=ls007035631,!ls020853190&view=simple&sort=release_date,asc&count=250
Not found: Gabriella Gatti (b. 1908) Apollo Granforte (b. 1886) Tancredi Pasero (b. 1892) Alexander Pirogov (b. 1899) Josef Schmidt (b. 1904) Leonard Sobinov (b. 1872) Ganne Walska (b. 1891)
Then started adding my own. "Movies" includes television.
Tap here to view alphabetically.
Films where I wanted to make notes, not public reviews. Most notes live at the public site http://bdrdiary.blogspot.com/
See also Opera Composers.
Beethoven: Fidelio (vinyl: Nilsson, McCracken, Maazel)
from Greenberg's How to Listen to and Understand Opera: ?Monteverdi: Orfeo ?Meyerbeer: Les Huguenots Carl Maria von Weber: Der Freischütz Glinka: Ruslan and Lyudmila ?Strauss: Capricio (see Met on Demand comments)
Note to self: dvr1 got better reception in Jan/Feb 2019. To select from this list by composer (many are not present#): Adams# | Adès | Alfano | Beethoven | Bellini | Berg# | Berlioz | Bizet | Borodin | Britten | Cuomo | Donizetti | Dun# | Dvorák# | Gershwin | Giordano | Gluck | Gounod | Handel# | Humperdinck | Lehár | Leoncavallo | Mascagni | Massenet | Mozart | Muhly | Mussorgsky | Offenbach | Poulenc# | Puccini | Rossini | J.Strauss | R.Strauss | Saariaho | Saint-Saëns | Shostakovich | Smetana# | Stravinsky | Tchaikovsky | Thomas | Verdi | Wagner | Weill# | Zandonai | and the rest
7Aug: 29 titles out of 145 changed from 7.n to 7.0. Only 1 other changed from 6.9 to 7.0: La traviata (1982) 22 titles out of 131 changed from 7.0 to 6.9 2 others changed from 6.8 to 6.9: Ma and Pa Kettle Go to Town (1950), Ma and Pa Kettle at Waikiki (1953) 8Aug: added 23 titles with comment. 1 other changed from 7.0 to 7.1 today: The Kettles in the Ozarks (1956) no changes occurred over the weekend. 12Aug: added 18 titles with comment. 3 others changed from 6.9 to 7 today: Ma and Pa Kettle on Vacation (1952), Rumpelstiltskin (1982), Crooklyn (1994) 14Aug: 24 drops 15Aug: 33 dropped; 1 rose: Song of the Thin Man (1947) 16Aug: 3 drops 17Aug: 16 dropped; 1 rose: Gilda Live (1980) 20Aug: no changes since 17Aug 21Aug: 11 dropped; 3 rose: Night Nurse (1931), Ma and Pa Kettle at the Fair (1952), The Kettles in the Ozarks (1956) 22Aug: 1 dropped; 5 rose: Traveling Saleslady (1935), The Princess Comes Across (1936), A Damsel in Distress (1937), A Dispatch from Reuters (1940), His Butler's Sister (1943) 24Aug: 3 drops 26Aug: 0 dropped; 2 rose: The Three Musketeers (1921), The Man in Possession (1931), both titles that previously dropped 27Aug: 1 dropped; 1 rose: A Damsel in Distress (1937) 29Aug: 1 dropped (rose on 27Aug) 1Sep: 1 dropped; 1 rose: A Damsel in Distress (1937) 9Sep: no changes since 1Sep 10Sep: 0 dropped; 1 rose: No Time for Sergeants (1955) On 11Sep 1 dropped, 4 rose, but I didn't record them. On 14Sep, those 5 titles were back to their prior rating, and 2 others shifted (1 up, 1 down). I've grown weary of this. If IMDb is still tweaking the algorithm, the results are not massive.
The Earl of Chicago (1940)
Most of the reviews already posted recommend against this film. I thought I'd chime in with the supporters.
Of the 8 films in the Warner Archive "Robert Montgomery Collection" bundle, this is my favorite, followed closely by Faithless (1932). Overall, I've rated 18 of his films, and gave 4 sevens, 9 sixes, 4 fives and 1 four. That fits my overall rating profile pretty well, except one should have been an 8 instead of a four or five. So I'm not a special fan of Montgomery.
I agree that Montgomery's portrayal here is heavy-handed. His character, the titular Earl of Chicago, talks and behaves like a cross between Huntz Hall and Leo Gorcey, with an annoying giggle to guild the dandy-lion. Oh, and leave us not omit the Cagney-esque shoulder-roll.
The Earl has a twist that is interesting, if unlikely for a Chicago bootlegger: he's gun-averse, to the point of breaking out in a sweat when he sees one in some circumstances. He's volatile and sadistic, as demonstrated by his ring-slapping a man who displays his gun "for a laugh." He happily pays his thugs overtime for after-hours physical intimidation of a customer who withdrew his business during these post-Prohibition days. (We don't get a fix on the year, but it must be close to the repeal of Prohibition in 1934, because his cousin Master Gerald is about 13 during the flashback (the actor was 15), but is with his regiment in France in the present-day of the movie, late 1939.)
The Earl learns and grows during the story. He is humbled by the grandeur of the House of Lords. He discovers history, both English and American. He learns the basics of the culture of the landed gentry and their tenants, particularly about noblesse oblige. Edmund Gwenn delivers his usual pleasurable and effective performance, helping to shepherd the American Earl through his discoveries.
Unless this print was politically enhanced for later re-release, this film was released in January 1940, in the middle of the Phoney War. Hitler invaded Poland September 1, 1939, and Britain, France, Australia and New Zealand declared war on Germany 2 days later. America declared its neutrality 2 days after that. Europe languished in the Phoney War until Hitler invaded France, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands in May 1940, although the Nazis began with other aggressions in March and April. (The History Place has a nice timeline, easily found by searching for "hitler's invasion of europe.")
Because the visitors to the castle in 1939 are mostly in uniform (not true during the flashback to 1934), and English troops in France are mentioned, I interpret part of the film's intent was to reduce America's isolationism, implying that it was OUR noblesse oblige to help defend Europe, especially England, against Hitler's aggression. The message is subtle, but I see it. MGM got more much overt about our noblesse oblige in 1940 with films Escape and The Mortal Storm.
The film's revenge plot line involves Edward Arnold's character (also delivered with his customary skill). One of the effective aspects of the film is that this character is written and performed to throw us off the scent. While we see his secret vengeful actions, he also interacts with the Earl and others beyond the need to disguise his intent. I wondered whether his actions were as destructive as they seemed.
MGM does its usual excellent job of providing beautifully designed and dressed sets.
I liked this movie. I only give a rating of 7+ if I recommend the film.
Yes Sir, That's My Baby (1949)
Watch it for O'Connor's dance
Right now, you can watch this on YouTube.
While I'm usually an avid fan of Charles Coburn (The More the Merrier, Gentlemen Prefer Blondes), his appearance here could have been replaced by an entirely different type without any loss.
About 34 minutes in, O'Connor does a very good dance, showcasing his grace and athleticism, and making interesting use of his non-dancing male extras.
I'd probably buy this title just for those 4-5 minutes. Universal needs to publish O'Connor's movies on DVD, or at least create a compilation of his musical numbers.
Moonlight Serenade (2009)
As a fan of old movies (primarily 1930's through 1950's), and especially musicals, I can recommend this movie. The music is wonderful, and includes standards by Irving Berlin, George and Ira Gershwin, Warren and Gordon, and Sammy Fain to name a few. (Hopefully the Soundtrack Listing will be updated soon.) These songs are well executed in a jazzy style, and apparently sung by the actors Amy Adams and Alec Newman. I'm particularly impressed by Amy Adams' voice and style.
The plot is no worse than any other musical, and I welcomed the "happy" ending, also no worse than a standard Hollywood musical contrivance. (I guess characterizing the ending as "happy" could be construed as a "spoiler.") I'm glad to see a modern movie that lacks nudity and action (don't remember any foul language either), but embraces music, especially old standards arranged with a modern flair.
My rating of 6/10 is based primarily on the music; the production was not luxurious, nor was the plot enthralling. To give you a comparison, I'd rate 'De-Lovely' (2004) as 7 or 7.5 (because of it's EXCELLENT use of Cole Porter's songs), and 'Night and Day' (1946) as a 6 because of its tepid and slow storyline.